TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceptions of gender equity in departmental leadership, research opportunities, and clinical work attitudes
T2 - an international survey of 11 781 anaesthesiologists
AU - Collaborators
AU - Zdravkovic, Marko
AU - Osinova, Denisa
AU - Brull, Sorin J.
AU - Prielipp, Richard C.
AU - Simões, Claudia M.
AU - Berger-Estilita, Joana
AU - Matas, Marijana
AU - Santos, Sofia
AU - Stroo, Kaie
AU - Bouzia, Aikaterini
AU - Samara, Gely
AU - Nagy, Balint
AU - Sorbello, Massimiliano
AU - Jagodzinska-Peškova, Jekaterina
AU - Demjanski, Vasko
AU - Agius, Velitchka S.
AU - Castro, Maria de L.
AU - Lindholm, Christofer
AU - Assov, Slavi
AU - Tomascikova, Michaela
AU - Saracoglu, Ayten
AU - Azzam, Hatem
AU - Hansel, Jan
AU - Noronha, Beatriz
AU - Myatra, Sheila
AU - Hofmeyr, Ross
AU - Bernasconi, Alejandro
AU - Dibue, Wilfrid M.
AU - Saituma, Vissolela
AU - Pupo, Alaide M.
AU - Mertens, Pieter
AU - Konarska, Milena
AU - Vasil'eva, Nathalie
AU - El Tahan, Mohamed R.
AU - Stüber, Frank
AU - Varosyan, Armen
AU - Chandra, Susilo
AU - Mikaszewska-Sokolewicz, Malgorzata
AU - Dilmen, Özlem K.
AU - Meco, Basak C.
AU - Campos, Marcello
AU - Kotfis, Katarzyna
AU - Beley, Nazer
AU - Loskutov, Oleh
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 British Journal of Anaesthesia
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - BACKGROUND: Women make up an increasing proportion of the physician workforce in anaesthesia, but they are consistently under-represented in leadership and governance.METHODS: We performed an internet-based survey to investigate career opportunities in leadership and research amongst anaesthesiologists. We also explored gender bias attributable to workplace attitudes and economic factors. The survey instrument was piloted, translated into seven languages, and uploaded to the SurveyMonkey® platform. We aimed to collect between 7800 and 13 700 responses from at least 100 countries. Participant consent and ethical approval were obtained. A quantitative analysis was done with χ
2 and Cramer's V as a measure of strength of associations. We used an inductive approach and a thematic content analysis for qualitative data on current barriers to leadership and research.
RESULTS: The 11 746 respondents, 51.3% women and 48.7% men, represented 148 countries; 35 respondents identified their gender as non-binary. Women were less driven to achieve leadership positions (P<0.001; Cramer's V: 0.11). Being a woman was reported as a disadvantage for leadership and research (P<0.001 for both; Cramer's V: 0.47 and 0.34, respectively). Women were also more likely to be mistreated in the workplace (odds ratio: 10.6; 95% confidence interval: 9.4-11.9; P<0.001), most commonly by surgeons. Several personal, departmental, institutional, and societal barriers in leadership and research were identified, and strategies to overcome them were suggested. Lower-income countries were associated with a significantly smaller gender gap (P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Whilst certain trends suggest improvements in the workplace, barriers to promotion of women in key leadership and research positions continue within anaesthesiology internationally.
AB - BACKGROUND: Women make up an increasing proportion of the physician workforce in anaesthesia, but they are consistently under-represented in leadership and governance.METHODS: We performed an internet-based survey to investigate career opportunities in leadership and research amongst anaesthesiologists. We also explored gender bias attributable to workplace attitudes and economic factors. The survey instrument was piloted, translated into seven languages, and uploaded to the SurveyMonkey® platform. We aimed to collect between 7800 and 13 700 responses from at least 100 countries. Participant consent and ethical approval were obtained. A quantitative analysis was done with χ
2 and Cramer's V as a measure of strength of associations. We used an inductive approach and a thematic content analysis for qualitative data on current barriers to leadership and research.
RESULTS: The 11 746 respondents, 51.3% women and 48.7% men, represented 148 countries; 35 respondents identified their gender as non-binary. Women were less driven to achieve leadership positions (P<0.001; Cramer's V: 0.11). Being a woman was reported as a disadvantage for leadership and research (P<0.001 for both; Cramer's V: 0.47 and 0.34, respectively). Women were also more likely to be mistreated in the workplace (odds ratio: 10.6; 95% confidence interval: 9.4-11.9; P<0.001), most commonly by surgeons. Several personal, departmental, institutional, and societal barriers in leadership and research were identified, and strategies to overcome them were suggested. Lower-income countries were associated with a significantly smaller gender gap (P<0.001).CONCLUSIONS: Whilst certain trends suggest improvements in the workplace, barriers to promotion of women in key leadership and research positions continue within anaesthesiology internationally.
KW - anaesthesiology
KW - gender equity
KW - gender gap
KW - global survey
KW - leadership
KW - physician perception
KW - research
KW - work attitudes
KW - Attitude of Health Personnel
KW - Leadership
KW - Humans
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Male
KW - Sexism
KW - Anesthesiologists
KW - Adult
KW - Biomedical Research
KW - Female
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85078037791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85078037791&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.022
DO - 10.1016/j.bja.2019.12.022
M3 - Article
C2 - 32005515
AN - SCOPUS:85078037791
SN - 0007-0912
VL - 124
SP - e160-e170
JO - British Journal of Anaesthesia
JF - British Journal of Anaesthesia
IS - 3
ER -