TY - JOUR
T1 - Perceived Message Effectiveness Measures in Tobacco Education Campaigns
T2 - A Systematic Review
AU - Noar, Seth M.
AU - Bell, Trevor
AU - Kelley, Dannielle
AU - Barker, Joshua
AU - Yzer, Marco
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018, © 2018 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.
PY - 2018/10/2
Y1 - 2018/10/2
N2 - Target audience ratings of the likely impact of persuasive messages, known as perceived message effectiveness (PME), are commonly used during message development and selection. PME is also used to examine receptivity of messages after they are fully developed or deployed. Despite this, we know little about the conceptual and methodological characteristics of extant PME measures used in the literature. We conducted a systematic review of tobacco education video, print, and audio campaign studies to examine conceptual and methodological characteristics of PME measures. One hundred twenty-six PME measures from 75 studies conducted in 21 countries with more than 61,000 participants were reviewed. Results indicated considerable variability in measures’ focus on general perceptions of a message (i.e., message perceptions) vs. perceptions of expected message effects (i.e., effects perceptions). Considerable variability was also found on underlying persuasive constructs, use of referents, and referencing of behavior in PME items and measures. We conclude with several recommendations for future research on PME measurement and validation.
AB - Target audience ratings of the likely impact of persuasive messages, known as perceived message effectiveness (PME), are commonly used during message development and selection. PME is also used to examine receptivity of messages after they are fully developed or deployed. Despite this, we know little about the conceptual and methodological characteristics of extant PME measures used in the literature. We conducted a systematic review of tobacco education video, print, and audio campaign studies to examine conceptual and methodological characteristics of PME measures. One hundred twenty-six PME measures from 75 studies conducted in 21 countries with more than 61,000 participants were reviewed. Results indicated considerable variability in measures’ focus on general perceptions of a message (i.e., message perceptions) vs. perceptions of expected message effects (i.e., effects perceptions). Considerable variability was also found on underlying persuasive constructs, use of referents, and referencing of behavior in PME items and measures. We conclude with several recommendations for future research on PME measurement and validation.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85049618113
UR - https://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049618113&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/19312458.2018.1483017
DO - 10.1080/19312458.2018.1483017
M3 - Article
C2 - 31428217
AN - SCOPUS:85049618113
SN - 1931-2458
VL - 12
SP - 295
EP - 313
JO - Communication Methods and Measures
JF - Communication Methods and Measures
IS - 4
ER -