Perceived gender presentation among transgender and gender diverse youth

Approaches to analysis and associations with bullying victimization and emotional distress

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: As measures of birth-assigned sex, gender identity, and perceived gender presentation are increasingly included in large-scale research studies, data analysis approaches incorporating such measures are needed. Large samples capable of demonstrating variation within the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) community can inform intervention efforts to improve health equity. A population-based sample of TGD youth was used to examine associations between perceived gender presentation, bullying victimization, and emotional distress using two data analysis approaches. Methods: This secondary data analysis of the Minnesota Student Survey included 2168 9th and 11th graders who identified as "transgender, genderqueer, genderfluid, or unsure about their gender identity." Youth reported their biological sex, how others perceived their gender presentation, experiences of four forms of bullying victimization, and four measures of emotional distress. Logistic regression and multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare and contrast two analysis approaches. Results: Logistic regressions indicated that TGD youth perceived as more gender incongruent had higher odds of bullying victimization and emotional distress relative to those perceived as very congruent with their biological sex. Multifactor ANOVAs demonstrated more variable patterns and allowed for comparisons of each perceived presentation group with all other groups, reflecting nuances that exist within TGD youth. Conclusion: Researchers should adopt data analysis strategies that allow for comparisons of all perceived gender presentation categories rather than assigning a reference group. Those working with TGD youth should be particularly attuned to youth perceived as gender incongruent as they may be more likely to experience bullying victimization and emotional distress.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)312-319
Number of pages8
JournalLGBT Health
Volume5
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2018

Fingerprint

Transgender Persons
Bullying
Crime Victims
Analysis of Variance
Logistic Models

Keywords

  • adolescence
  • bullying
  • gender identity
  • mental health
  • perceived gender presentation

Cite this

@article{6599eb0ee2ed4a258411dbbbedea7d05,
title = "Perceived gender presentation among transgender and gender diverse youth: Approaches to analysis and associations with bullying victimization and emotional distress",
abstract = "Purpose: As measures of birth-assigned sex, gender identity, and perceived gender presentation are increasingly included in large-scale research studies, data analysis approaches incorporating such measures are needed. Large samples capable of demonstrating variation within the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) community can inform intervention efforts to improve health equity. A population-based sample of TGD youth was used to examine associations between perceived gender presentation, bullying victimization, and emotional distress using two data analysis approaches. Methods: This secondary data analysis of the Minnesota Student Survey included 2168 9th and 11th graders who identified as {"}transgender, genderqueer, genderfluid, or unsure about their gender identity.{"} Youth reported their biological sex, how others perceived their gender presentation, experiences of four forms of bullying victimization, and four measures of emotional distress. Logistic regression and multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare and contrast two analysis approaches. Results: Logistic regressions indicated that TGD youth perceived as more gender incongruent had higher odds of bullying victimization and emotional distress relative to those perceived as very congruent with their biological sex. Multifactor ANOVAs demonstrated more variable patterns and allowed for comparisons of each perceived presentation group with all other groups, reflecting nuances that exist within TGD youth. Conclusion: Researchers should adopt data analysis strategies that allow for comparisons of all perceived gender presentation categories rather than assigning a reference group. Those working with TGD youth should be particularly attuned to youth perceived as gender incongruent as they may be more likely to experience bullying victimization and emotional distress.",
keywords = "adolescence, bullying, gender identity, mental health, perceived gender presentation",
author = "Gower, {Amy L} and Nic Rider and Eli Coleman and Camille Brown and McMorris, {Barbara J} and Eisenberg, {Marla E}",
year = "2018",
month = "7",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1089/lgbt.2017.0176",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "5",
pages = "312--319",
journal = "LGBT Health",
issn = "2325-8292",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert Inc.",
number = "5",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Perceived gender presentation among transgender and gender diverse youth

T2 - Approaches to analysis and associations with bullying victimization and emotional distress

AU - Gower, Amy L

AU - Rider, Nic

AU - Coleman, Eli

AU - Brown, Camille

AU - McMorris, Barbara J

AU - Eisenberg, Marla E

PY - 2018/7/1

Y1 - 2018/7/1

N2 - Purpose: As measures of birth-assigned sex, gender identity, and perceived gender presentation are increasingly included in large-scale research studies, data analysis approaches incorporating such measures are needed. Large samples capable of demonstrating variation within the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) community can inform intervention efforts to improve health equity. A population-based sample of TGD youth was used to examine associations between perceived gender presentation, bullying victimization, and emotional distress using two data analysis approaches. Methods: This secondary data analysis of the Minnesota Student Survey included 2168 9th and 11th graders who identified as "transgender, genderqueer, genderfluid, or unsure about their gender identity." Youth reported their biological sex, how others perceived their gender presentation, experiences of four forms of bullying victimization, and four measures of emotional distress. Logistic regression and multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare and contrast two analysis approaches. Results: Logistic regressions indicated that TGD youth perceived as more gender incongruent had higher odds of bullying victimization and emotional distress relative to those perceived as very congruent with their biological sex. Multifactor ANOVAs demonstrated more variable patterns and allowed for comparisons of each perceived presentation group with all other groups, reflecting nuances that exist within TGD youth. Conclusion: Researchers should adopt data analysis strategies that allow for comparisons of all perceived gender presentation categories rather than assigning a reference group. Those working with TGD youth should be particularly attuned to youth perceived as gender incongruent as they may be more likely to experience bullying victimization and emotional distress.

AB - Purpose: As measures of birth-assigned sex, gender identity, and perceived gender presentation are increasingly included in large-scale research studies, data analysis approaches incorporating such measures are needed. Large samples capable of demonstrating variation within the transgender and gender diverse (TGD) community can inform intervention efforts to improve health equity. A population-based sample of TGD youth was used to examine associations between perceived gender presentation, bullying victimization, and emotional distress using two data analysis approaches. Methods: This secondary data analysis of the Minnesota Student Survey included 2168 9th and 11th graders who identified as "transgender, genderqueer, genderfluid, or unsure about their gender identity." Youth reported their biological sex, how others perceived their gender presentation, experiences of four forms of bullying victimization, and four measures of emotional distress. Logistic regression and multifactor analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to compare and contrast two analysis approaches. Results: Logistic regressions indicated that TGD youth perceived as more gender incongruent had higher odds of bullying victimization and emotional distress relative to those perceived as very congruent with their biological sex. Multifactor ANOVAs demonstrated more variable patterns and allowed for comparisons of each perceived presentation group with all other groups, reflecting nuances that exist within TGD youth. Conclusion: Researchers should adopt data analysis strategies that allow for comparisons of all perceived gender presentation categories rather than assigning a reference group. Those working with TGD youth should be particularly attuned to youth perceived as gender incongruent as they may be more likely to experience bullying victimization and emotional distress.

KW - adolescence

KW - bullying

KW - gender identity

KW - mental health

KW - perceived gender presentation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049610803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049610803&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1089/lgbt.2017.0176

DO - 10.1089/lgbt.2017.0176

M3 - Article

VL - 5

SP - 312

EP - 319

JO - LGBT Health

JF - LGBT Health

SN - 2325-8292

IS - 5

ER -