Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pediatric procedural sedation using the combination of ketamine and propofol outside of the emergency department: A report from the pediatric sedation research consortium

  • Jocelyn R. Grunwell
  • , Curtis Travers
  • , Anne G. Stormorken
  • , Patricia D. Scherrer
  • , Corrie E. Chumpitazi
  • , Jana A. Stockwell
  • , Mark G. Roback
  • , Joseph Cravero
  • , Pradip P. Kamat

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Objectives: Outcomes associated with a sedative regimen comprised ketamine + propofol for pediatric procedural sedation outside of both the pediatric emergency department and operating room are underreported. We used the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium database to describe a multicenter experience with ketamine + propofol by pediatric sedation providers. Design: Prospective observational study of children receiving IV ketamine + propofol for procedural sedation outside of the operating room and emergency department using data abstracted from the Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium during 2007-2015. Setting: Procedural sedation services from academic, community, free-standing children's hospitals, and pediatric wards within general hospitals. Patients: Children from birth to less than or equal to 21 years old. Interventions: None. Measurements and Main Results: A total of 7,313 pediatric procedural sedations were performed using IV ketamine + propofol as the primary sedative regimen. Median age was 84 months (range, < 1 mo to ≤ 21 yr; interquartile range, 36-144); 80.6% were American Society of Anesthesiologists-Physical Status less than III. The majority of sedation was performed in dedicated sedation or radiology units (76.1%). Procedures were successfully completed in 99.8% of patients. Anticholinergics (glycopyrrolate and atropine) or benzodiazepines (midazolam and lorazepam) were used in 14.2% and 41.3%, respectively. The overall adverse event and serious adverse event rates were 9.79% (95% CI, 9.12-10.49%) and 3.47% (95% CI, 3.07-3.92%), respectively. No deaths occurred. Risk factors associated with an increase in odds of adverse event included ASA status greater than or equal to III, dental suite, cardiac catheterization laboratory or radiology/sedation suite location, a primary diagnosis of having a gastrointestinal illness, and the coadministration of an anticholinergic. Conclusions: Using Pediatric Sedation Research Consortium data, we describe the diverse use of IV ketamine + propofol for procedural sedation in the largest reported cohort of children to date. Data from this study may be used to design sufficiently powered prospective randomized, double-blind studies comparing outcomes of sedation between commonly administered sedative and analgesic medication regimens.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)e356-e363
JournalPediatric Critical Care Medicine
Volume18
Issue number8
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 1 2017

Keywords

  • Adverse events
  • Ketamine
  • Pediatric procedural sedation
  • Propofol
  • Risk factors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pediatric procedural sedation using the combination of ketamine and propofol outside of the emergency department: A report from the pediatric sedation research consortium'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this