Paying for harbor maintenance in the US: Options for moving past the Harbor Maintenance Tax

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

sThe Harbor Maintenance Tax is a fundamentally flawed maintenance funding mechanism for the critical US port system. Three alternatives were analyzed. User fee rates were estimated for either a national or regional tonnage based fee. Our results indicate that maintenance cost recovering regional fees could vary widely from about 10. cents per tonne to nearly 80. cents per tonne. A national rate would be about 30. cents per tonne. The large regional differences and affects on bulk shippers are likely to make implementing and maintaining cost recovering tonnage based fees infeasible. Two other mechanisms are considered. One possibility is to abolish the HMT without a replacement mechanism. The obvious strength of this approach is its simplicity, the weaknesses is that it is not budget neutral. Another possibility is to increase the federal diesel tax rate. One strength of the approach is the reasonable rate increase required to recover port maintenance costs (estimated between 0.278 and 0.315. cents per liter). An additional strength is that relatively inefficient fuel users will either make the largest share of the additional payments or the freight will shift modes to one that is more efficient. One weakness is that the rate has been unchanged since 1997, this points to the political difficulty involved in passing such a rate increase.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)210-221
Number of pages12
JournalTransportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
Volume74
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Fingerprint

harbor
Ports and harbors
Taxation
taxes
fee
costs
Costs
regional difference
budget
funding
Tax
Fees
Maintenance cost

Keywords

  • Abolishment
  • Diesel fuel tax
  • GATT
  • Harbor maintenance tax
  • Regression analysis
  • User fees

Cite this

@article{61e0aae4c6c54d3791dab98ae47f8b4b,
title = "Paying for harbor maintenance in the US: Options for moving past the Harbor Maintenance Tax",
abstract = "sThe Harbor Maintenance Tax is a fundamentally flawed maintenance funding mechanism for the critical US port system. Three alternatives were analyzed. User fee rates were estimated for either a national or regional tonnage based fee. Our results indicate that maintenance cost recovering regional fees could vary widely from about 10. cents per tonne to nearly 80. cents per tonne. A national rate would be about 30. cents per tonne. The large regional differences and affects on bulk shippers are likely to make implementing and maintaining cost recovering tonnage based fees infeasible. Two other mechanisms are considered. One possibility is to abolish the HMT without a replacement mechanism. The obvious strength of this approach is its simplicity, the weaknesses is that it is not budget neutral. Another possibility is to increase the federal diesel tax rate. One strength of the approach is the reasonable rate increase required to recover port maintenance costs (estimated between 0.278 and 0.315. cents per liter). An additional strength is that relatively inefficient fuel users will either make the largest share of the additional payments or the freight will shift modes to one that is more efficient. One weakness is that the rate has been unchanged since 1997, this points to the political difficulty involved in passing such a rate increase.",
keywords = "Abolishment, Diesel fuel tax, GATT, Harbor maintenance tax, Regression analysis, User fees",
author = "McIntosh, {C. R.} and Wilmot, {N. A.} and Skalberg, {R. K.}",
year = "2015",
month = "4",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.014",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "74",
pages = "210--221",
journal = "Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice",
issn = "0965-8564",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Paying for harbor maintenance in the US

T2 - Options for moving past the Harbor Maintenance Tax

AU - McIntosh, C. R.

AU - Wilmot, N. A.

AU - Skalberg, R. K.

PY - 2015/4/1

Y1 - 2015/4/1

N2 - sThe Harbor Maintenance Tax is a fundamentally flawed maintenance funding mechanism for the critical US port system. Three alternatives were analyzed. User fee rates were estimated for either a national or regional tonnage based fee. Our results indicate that maintenance cost recovering regional fees could vary widely from about 10. cents per tonne to nearly 80. cents per tonne. A national rate would be about 30. cents per tonne. The large regional differences and affects on bulk shippers are likely to make implementing and maintaining cost recovering tonnage based fees infeasible. Two other mechanisms are considered. One possibility is to abolish the HMT without a replacement mechanism. The obvious strength of this approach is its simplicity, the weaknesses is that it is not budget neutral. Another possibility is to increase the federal diesel tax rate. One strength of the approach is the reasonable rate increase required to recover port maintenance costs (estimated between 0.278 and 0.315. cents per liter). An additional strength is that relatively inefficient fuel users will either make the largest share of the additional payments or the freight will shift modes to one that is more efficient. One weakness is that the rate has been unchanged since 1997, this points to the political difficulty involved in passing such a rate increase.

AB - sThe Harbor Maintenance Tax is a fundamentally flawed maintenance funding mechanism for the critical US port system. Three alternatives were analyzed. User fee rates were estimated for either a national or regional tonnage based fee. Our results indicate that maintenance cost recovering regional fees could vary widely from about 10. cents per tonne to nearly 80. cents per tonne. A national rate would be about 30. cents per tonne. The large regional differences and affects on bulk shippers are likely to make implementing and maintaining cost recovering tonnage based fees infeasible. Two other mechanisms are considered. One possibility is to abolish the HMT without a replacement mechanism. The obvious strength of this approach is its simplicity, the weaknesses is that it is not budget neutral. Another possibility is to increase the federal diesel tax rate. One strength of the approach is the reasonable rate increase required to recover port maintenance costs (estimated between 0.278 and 0.315. cents per liter). An additional strength is that relatively inefficient fuel users will either make the largest share of the additional payments or the freight will shift modes to one that is more efficient. One weakness is that the rate has been unchanged since 1997, this points to the political difficulty involved in passing such a rate increase.

KW - Abolishment

KW - Diesel fuel tax

KW - GATT

KW - Harbor maintenance tax

KW - Regression analysis

KW - User fees

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924719834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924719834&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.014

DO - 10.1016/j.tra.2015.02.014

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84924719834

VL - 74

SP - 210

EP - 221

JO - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

JF - Transportation Research, Part A: Policy and Practice

SN - 0965-8564

ER -