Pay for performance and medical professionalism

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Health care delivery systems are widely studying and implementing physician pay for performance (P4P) initiatives to improve quality and control costs. However, the increasing focus on quality-driven financial incentives has some troubling implications for medical professionalism. This article examines the P4P concept in light of a notion of medical fiduciary professionalism that dates back to the 18th-century Scottish physician John Gregory. Gregory's principles serve as a framework to assess the appropriateness of P4P initiatives in disseminating the principles of high-quality care without damage to professionalism, the patient-physician relationship, and access to care for all patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)9-18
Number of pages10
JournalQuality management in health care
Volume17
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2008

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • Physician incentive plans
  • Professionalism

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pay for performance and medical professionalism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this