Patterns and correlates of urban trail use: Evidence from the Cincinnati metropolitan area

Na Chen, Greg H Lindsey, Chih Hao Wang

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Transportation, parks, and health organizations are collaborating to develop multiuse trail networks that meet the needs of metropolitan residents for utilitarian travel, recreation, and fitness. This paper describes how trails are used and explores correlates of trail use in the Greater Cincinnati region. Drawing on a systematic survey of users, we use ordinary probit and spatial models to explore the effects of socio-demographics, trip characteristics, attitudes, and the built environment, on recreational and utilitarian use. Most (89%) respondents report using trails for recreation; just 8.8% say they use trails for utilitarian purposes. Ordinary probit models show that users reporting recreational use are significantly more likely to be female, have incomes greater than $120,000, and travel longer distances on trails, but less likely to bike or walk to access trails. Transit connectivity is negatively correlated with recreational use. Trail users reporting utilitarian purposes are disproportionately male, significantly less likely to have incomes greater than $120,000, and more likely to take short trips on trails and to access trails by cycling or walking. They say they would commute more by cycling if connectivity were improved. Spatial probit model indicates negative spatial relationships among recreational users, implying the absence of a spatially-based common culture of trail use. Trail planners in this region can use these findings to strengthen the planning and design of trail networks and to meet the needs of different users. Given the finding most trail use is for recreational purposes, additional studies of the needs of utilitarian users are warranted.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)303-315
Number of pages13
JournalTransportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment
Volume67
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2019

Fingerprint

metropolitan area
agglomeration area
connectivity
income
evidence
walking
recreation
fitness
Health
long-distance travel
Planning
need
travel
resident
planning
health
built environment
effect

Keywords

  • Multiuse trail
  • Planning
  • Recreation
  • Spatial modeling
  • Transportation

Cite this

Patterns and correlates of urban trail use : Evidence from the Cincinnati metropolitan area. / Chen, Na; Lindsey, Greg H; Wang, Chih Hao.

In: Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, Vol. 67, 01.02.2019, p. 303-315.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{edd6f532c93948ee9fe3233021471215,
title = "Patterns and correlates of urban trail use: Evidence from the Cincinnati metropolitan area",
abstract = "Transportation, parks, and health organizations are collaborating to develop multiuse trail networks that meet the needs of metropolitan residents for utilitarian travel, recreation, and fitness. This paper describes how trails are used and explores correlates of trail use in the Greater Cincinnati region. Drawing on a systematic survey of users, we use ordinary probit and spatial models to explore the effects of socio-demographics, trip characteristics, attitudes, and the built environment, on recreational and utilitarian use. Most (89{\%}) respondents report using trails for recreation; just 8.8{\%} say they use trails for utilitarian purposes. Ordinary probit models show that users reporting recreational use are significantly more likely to be female, have incomes greater than $120,000, and travel longer distances on trails, but less likely to bike or walk to access trails. Transit connectivity is negatively correlated with recreational use. Trail users reporting utilitarian purposes are disproportionately male, significantly less likely to have incomes greater than $120,000, and more likely to take short trips on trails and to access trails by cycling or walking. They say they would commute more by cycling if connectivity were improved. Spatial probit model indicates negative spatial relationships among recreational users, implying the absence of a spatially-based common culture of trail use. Trail planners in this region can use these findings to strengthen the planning and design of trail networks and to meet the needs of different users. Given the finding most trail use is for recreational purposes, additional studies of the needs of utilitarian users are warranted.",
keywords = "Multiuse trail, Planning, Recreation, Spatial modeling, Transportation",
author = "Na Chen and Lindsey, {Greg H} and Wang, {Chih Hao}",
year = "2019",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.007",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "67",
pages = "303--315",
journal = "Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment",
issn = "1361-9209",
publisher = "Elsevier Limited",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patterns and correlates of urban trail use

T2 - Evidence from the Cincinnati metropolitan area

AU - Chen, Na

AU - Lindsey, Greg H

AU - Wang, Chih Hao

PY - 2019/2/1

Y1 - 2019/2/1

N2 - Transportation, parks, and health organizations are collaborating to develop multiuse trail networks that meet the needs of metropolitan residents for utilitarian travel, recreation, and fitness. This paper describes how trails are used and explores correlates of trail use in the Greater Cincinnati region. Drawing on a systematic survey of users, we use ordinary probit and spatial models to explore the effects of socio-demographics, trip characteristics, attitudes, and the built environment, on recreational and utilitarian use. Most (89%) respondents report using trails for recreation; just 8.8% say they use trails for utilitarian purposes. Ordinary probit models show that users reporting recreational use are significantly more likely to be female, have incomes greater than $120,000, and travel longer distances on trails, but less likely to bike or walk to access trails. Transit connectivity is negatively correlated with recreational use. Trail users reporting utilitarian purposes are disproportionately male, significantly less likely to have incomes greater than $120,000, and more likely to take short trips on trails and to access trails by cycling or walking. They say they would commute more by cycling if connectivity were improved. Spatial probit model indicates negative spatial relationships among recreational users, implying the absence of a spatially-based common culture of trail use. Trail planners in this region can use these findings to strengthen the planning and design of trail networks and to meet the needs of different users. Given the finding most trail use is for recreational purposes, additional studies of the needs of utilitarian users are warranted.

AB - Transportation, parks, and health organizations are collaborating to develop multiuse trail networks that meet the needs of metropolitan residents for utilitarian travel, recreation, and fitness. This paper describes how trails are used and explores correlates of trail use in the Greater Cincinnati region. Drawing on a systematic survey of users, we use ordinary probit and spatial models to explore the effects of socio-demographics, trip characteristics, attitudes, and the built environment, on recreational and utilitarian use. Most (89%) respondents report using trails for recreation; just 8.8% say they use trails for utilitarian purposes. Ordinary probit models show that users reporting recreational use are significantly more likely to be female, have incomes greater than $120,000, and travel longer distances on trails, but less likely to bike or walk to access trails. Transit connectivity is negatively correlated with recreational use. Trail users reporting utilitarian purposes are disproportionately male, significantly less likely to have incomes greater than $120,000, and more likely to take short trips on trails and to access trails by cycling or walking. They say they would commute more by cycling if connectivity were improved. Spatial probit model indicates negative spatial relationships among recreational users, implying the absence of a spatially-based common culture of trail use. Trail planners in this region can use these findings to strengthen the planning and design of trail networks and to meet the needs of different users. Given the finding most trail use is for recreational purposes, additional studies of the needs of utilitarian users are warranted.

KW - Multiuse trail

KW - Planning

KW - Recreation

KW - Spatial modeling

KW - Transportation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85058157197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85058157197&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.007

DO - 10.1016/j.trd.2018.12.007

M3 - Article

VL - 67

SP - 303

EP - 315

JO - Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment

JF - Transportation Research, Part D: Transport and Environment

SN - 1361-9209

ER -