Abstract
Parasites are more fecund than free-living relatives. The traditional explanation of this is that parasites have to compensate for massive mortality in the transmission phase of their life cycles, but there are neo-Darwinian problems with this interpretation. Similarly, parasites invest more resources in reproduction than free-living relatives but often live longer as adults, and yet negative correlations are expected between fecundity and longevity. These patterns and paradoxes are discussed within the context of a general life-cycle theory. The theory is also used to address questions concerning the influence of age-specific mortality on life-cycle patterns, the trade-off between gamete size and numbers, and the relative merits of gametic and non-gametic reproduction. Wherever possible, the theory is related to facts about parasites.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 197-207 |
| Number of pages | 11 |
| Journal | Parasitology |
| Volume | 86 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Apr 1983 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Pattern and Paradox in Parasite Reproduction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS