Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Patients who have undergone total shoulder arthroplasty prefer greater surgeon involvement in shared decision making

  • Yazdan Raji
  • , John T. Strony
  • , Tyler J. Moon
  • , Kira L. Smith
  • , Lakshmanan Sivasundaram
  • , Nellie Renko
  • , Brian N. Victoroff
  • , Robert J. Gillespie

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

Abstract

Background: There has been a shift in medical decision making from a paternalist model to a shared decision-making (SDM) approach, described as a patient-physician relationship where both parties collaborate to arrive on an evidence-based treatment regimen that best suits the patient's needs and values. However, there is a scarcity in evidence regarding SDM in shoulder arthroplasty. The purpose of this study was to evaluate overall patient preference for SDM and determine demographic and socioeconomic factors related to SDM preference in those undergoing shoulder arthroplasty. Methods: Patients aged 40-89 years who had undergone a total shoulder arthroplasty were enrolled. Two-part questionnaires were administered collecting patient demographic information and SDM subscale scores postoperatively. Bivariate and multivariate regression models were used to determine factors associated with SDM Total and subscale scores. Results: A total of 125 patients (53 male; mean age, 69.5 ± 10.4 years) who had undergone primary total shoulder arthroplasty were included. The mean Total SDM score was −2.24 ± 1.9 and the Preoperative, Operative, and Postoperative SDM subscale scores were −1.54 ± 2.0, −2.59 ± 2.2, and −2.48 ± 2.1, respectively, indicating a preference for SDM in the Preoperative subscale and surgeon-driven decision making in the total score and other 2 subscales. Multivariate regression models demonstrated a preference for surgeon decision making at both the 4-12-week postoperative period for the Preoperative subscale (odds ratio [OR] −1.03, 95% CI −2.0, −0.1, P = .039) and the 2-4-week postoperative period for the Operative subscale (OR −1.74, 95% CI −3.4, −0.1, P = .038) when compared to patients at the 2-week postoperative period. No other variables were significantly associated with any of the SDM subscale scores or Total SDM score. Conclusion: Patients reported a more passive role in the decision-making process with an overall preference for a surgeon-led approach in primary total shoulder arthroplasty. Patients preferred a shared decision-making approach in regard to preoperative considerations but indicated a significant preference for surgeon-led decision making regarding day of surgery decisions. There were no correlations between SDM scores and age, sex, race, income, education level, insurance type, or treating surgeon. Overall, patients demonstrated a predilection for an SDM approach for preoperative considerations, contrary to those decisions associated with the day of surgery and postoperative care.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)645-652
Number of pages8
JournalJournal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Volume32
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 2023
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery Board of Trustees

Keywords

  • Patients
  • Retrospective Cross-Sectional Design
  • shared decision making
  • Shoulder arthroplasty
  • Survey Study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Patients who have undergone total shoulder arthroplasty prefer greater surgeon involvement in shared decision making'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this