Patient-reported and clinical outcomes up to 2 years after primary rotator cuff repair: do we need to collect patient-reported outcomes at 2-year follow-up visit?

Keyphrases

• Patient-reported Outcomes 100%
• 2-year Follow-up 100%
• Rotator Cuff Repair 100%
• Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation 100%
• Patient Clinical Outcomes 100%
• Evaluation Score 83%
• Minimal Clinically Important Difference 50%
• Clinically Significant 33%
• First Year 33%
• Resource Allocation 16%
• Health Systems 16%
• Statistical Analysis 16%
• Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 16%
• Surgical Patients 16%
• Extended Follow-up 16%
• Treatment Burden 16%
• Resource Optimization 16%
• Male Patients 16%
• Regression Model 16%
• Functional Improvement 16%
• 1-year Follow-up 16%
• After Surgery 16%
• Baseline Characteristics 16%
• Clinical Value 16%
• Change Assessment 16%
• Postoperative Outcomes 16%
• Symptomatic Improvement 16%
• Clinical Insight 16%
• Clinically Insignificant 16%
• Shoulder Surgery 16%
• Shoulder Fractures 16%
• Outcome Improvement 16%
• Surgical Details 16%
• Journal Guidelines 16%
• Clinical Outcomes 16%
• Clinically Meaningful Improvement 16%

Nursing and Health Professions

• Patient-Reported Outcome 100%
• Clinical Outcome 100%
• Minimal Clinically Important Difference 60%
• Practice Guideline 20%
• Healthcare System 20%
• Resource Allocation 20%
• Student T Test 20%
• Shoulder Surgery 20%
• Shoulder Fracture 20%

Medicine and Dentistry

• Rotator Cuff 100%
• Patient-Reported Outcome 100%
• Minimal Clinically Important Difference 60%
• Health Care 20%
• Student T Test 20%
• Shoulder Surgery 20%
• Shoulder Fracture 20%