Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care: Potential missed opportunities to avoid harm

Ellen M. McCreedy, Robert L Kane, Sarah E Gollust, Nathan D Shippee, Kirby D Clark

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: Clinicians strive to deliver individualized, patient-centered care. However, these intentions are understudied. This research explores how patient characteristics associated with an high riskto-benefit ratio with hypoglycemia medications affect decision making by primary care clinicians. Methods: Using a vignette-based survey, we queried primary care clinicians on their intended management of geriatric patients with diabetes. The patients' ages, disease durations, and comorbidities were systematically varied. Clinicians indicated whether they would intensify glycemic control by adding a second-line hypoglycemia medication. Results: A convenience sample of 336 primary care clinicians completed the survey. Despite the recommendations for HbA1c targets <8% for more complex patients, an 80-year-old woman with an HbA1c of 7.5%, longstanding diabetes, coronary disease, and cognitive impairment and with instrumental activity of daily living dependencies, had a predicted probability of treatment intensification of 35%. Internists were 11% and nurse practitioners were 14% more likely to intensify treatment than family physicians (P < .01). These provider differences remained significant after controlling for geographic differences in treatment intensification. Providers in Florida were more likely to intensify treatment (P < .01). Conclusions: Primary care clinicians often chose to intensify glycemic control despite individual patient factors that warrant higher glycemic targets based on existing guidelines. This research identifies possible missed opportunities for patient-centered goal setting and raises questions about the influence of training and practice environment on clinical decision making.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)192-200
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of the American Board of Family Medicine
Volume31
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1 2018

Fingerprint

Geriatrics
Guidelines
Primary Health Care
Hypoglycemia
Patient-Centered Care
Nurse Practitioners
Family Physicians
Therapeutics
Activities of Daily Living
Research
Coronary Disease
Comorbidity
Decision Making
Surveys and Questionnaires

Keywords

  • Blood glucose
  • Clinical decision-making
  • Diabetes mellitus
  • Geriatric health services
  • Hyperglycemia
  • Hypoglycemic agents
  • Patient-centered care
  • Primary health care

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Cite this

Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care : Potential missed opportunities to avoid harm. / McCreedy, Ellen M.; Kane, Robert L; Gollust, Sarah E; Shippee, Nathan D; Clark, Kirby D.

In: Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, Vol. 31, No. 2, 01.03.2018, p. 192-200.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{8460658c73c641b48700f7d9bf6c4b7a,
title = "Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care: Potential missed opportunities to avoid harm",
abstract = "Background: Clinicians strive to deliver individualized, patient-centered care. However, these intentions are understudied. This research explores how patient characteristics associated with an high riskto-benefit ratio with hypoglycemia medications affect decision making by primary care clinicians. Methods: Using a vignette-based survey, we queried primary care clinicians on their intended management of geriatric patients with diabetes. The patients' ages, disease durations, and comorbidities were systematically varied. Clinicians indicated whether they would intensify glycemic control by adding a second-line hypoglycemia medication. Results: A convenience sample of 336 primary care clinicians completed the survey. Despite the recommendations for HbA1c targets <8{\%} for more complex patients, an 80-year-old woman with an HbA1c of 7.5{\%}, longstanding diabetes, coronary disease, and cognitive impairment and with instrumental activity of daily living dependencies, had a predicted probability of treatment intensification of 35{\%}. Internists were 11{\%} and nurse practitioners were 14{\%} more likely to intensify treatment than family physicians (P < .01). These provider differences remained significant after controlling for geographic differences in treatment intensification. Providers in Florida were more likely to intensify treatment (P < .01). Conclusions: Primary care clinicians often chose to intensify glycemic control despite individual patient factors that warrant higher glycemic targets based on existing guidelines. This research identifies possible missed opportunities for patient-centered goal setting and raises questions about the influence of training and practice environment on clinical decision making.",
keywords = "Blood glucose, Clinical decision-making, Diabetes mellitus, Geriatric health services, Hyperglycemia, Hypoglycemic agents, Patient-centered care, Primary health care",
author = "McCreedy, {Ellen M.} and Kane, {Robert L} and Gollust, {Sarah E} and Shippee, {Nathan D} and Clark, {Kirby D}",
year = "2018",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170141",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "31",
pages = "192--200",
journal = "Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine",
issn = "1557-2625",
publisher = "American Board of Family Medicine",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Patient-centered guidelines for geriatric diabetes care

T2 - Potential missed opportunities to avoid harm

AU - McCreedy, Ellen M.

AU - Kane, Robert L

AU - Gollust, Sarah E

AU - Shippee, Nathan D

AU - Clark, Kirby D

PY - 2018/3/1

Y1 - 2018/3/1

N2 - Background: Clinicians strive to deliver individualized, patient-centered care. However, these intentions are understudied. This research explores how patient characteristics associated with an high riskto-benefit ratio with hypoglycemia medications affect decision making by primary care clinicians. Methods: Using a vignette-based survey, we queried primary care clinicians on their intended management of geriatric patients with diabetes. The patients' ages, disease durations, and comorbidities were systematically varied. Clinicians indicated whether they would intensify glycemic control by adding a second-line hypoglycemia medication. Results: A convenience sample of 336 primary care clinicians completed the survey. Despite the recommendations for HbA1c targets <8% for more complex patients, an 80-year-old woman with an HbA1c of 7.5%, longstanding diabetes, coronary disease, and cognitive impairment and with instrumental activity of daily living dependencies, had a predicted probability of treatment intensification of 35%. Internists were 11% and nurse practitioners were 14% more likely to intensify treatment than family physicians (P < .01). These provider differences remained significant after controlling for geographic differences in treatment intensification. Providers in Florida were more likely to intensify treatment (P < .01). Conclusions: Primary care clinicians often chose to intensify glycemic control despite individual patient factors that warrant higher glycemic targets based on existing guidelines. This research identifies possible missed opportunities for patient-centered goal setting and raises questions about the influence of training and practice environment on clinical decision making.

AB - Background: Clinicians strive to deliver individualized, patient-centered care. However, these intentions are understudied. This research explores how patient characteristics associated with an high riskto-benefit ratio with hypoglycemia medications affect decision making by primary care clinicians. Methods: Using a vignette-based survey, we queried primary care clinicians on their intended management of geriatric patients with diabetes. The patients' ages, disease durations, and comorbidities were systematically varied. Clinicians indicated whether they would intensify glycemic control by adding a second-line hypoglycemia medication. Results: A convenience sample of 336 primary care clinicians completed the survey. Despite the recommendations for HbA1c targets <8% for more complex patients, an 80-year-old woman with an HbA1c of 7.5%, longstanding diabetes, coronary disease, and cognitive impairment and with instrumental activity of daily living dependencies, had a predicted probability of treatment intensification of 35%. Internists were 11% and nurse practitioners were 14% more likely to intensify treatment than family physicians (P < .01). These provider differences remained significant after controlling for geographic differences in treatment intensification. Providers in Florida were more likely to intensify treatment (P < .01). Conclusions: Primary care clinicians often chose to intensify glycemic control despite individual patient factors that warrant higher glycemic targets based on existing guidelines. This research identifies possible missed opportunities for patient-centered goal setting and raises questions about the influence of training and practice environment on clinical decision making.

KW - Blood glucose

KW - Clinical decision-making

KW - Diabetes mellitus

KW - Geriatric health services

KW - Hyperglycemia

KW - Hypoglycemic agents

KW - Patient-centered care

KW - Primary health care

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85044150697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85044150697&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170141

DO - 10.3122/jabfm.2018.02.170141

M3 - Article

C2 - 29535235

AN - SCOPUS:85044150697

VL - 31

SP - 192

EP - 200

JO - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

JF - Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine

SN - 1557-2625

IS - 2

ER -