Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Pathways to sustainability: a quantitative comparison of aerobic and anaerobic C1 bioconversion routes

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

Abstract

One-carbon (C1) substrates are attractive feedstocks for biological upgrading as part of a circular, carbon-negative bioeconomy. Nature has evolved a diverse set of C1-trophs that use a variety of pathways. Additionally, intensive effort has recently been invested in developing synthetic C1 assimilation pathways. This complicated landscape presents the question: “What pathways should be used to produce what products from what C1 substrates?” To guide the selection, we calculate and compare maximal theoretical yields for a range of bioproducts from different C1 feedstocks and pathways. The results highlight emerging opportunities to apply metabolic engineering to specific C1 pathways to improve pathway performance. Since the C1 landscape is dynamic, with new discoveries in the biochemistry of native pathways and new synthetic alternatives rapidly emerging, we present detailed procedures for these yield calculations to enable others to easily adapt them to additional scenarios as a foundation for establishing industrially relevant production strains.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number103310
JournalCurrent opinion in biotechnology
Volume93
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025
Externally publishedYes

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article
  • Review
  • Comparative Study

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Pathways to sustainability: a quantitative comparison of aerobic and anaerobic C1 bioconversion routes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this