TY - JOUR
T1 - Pathways to coastal resiliency
T2 - The Adaptive Gradients Framework
AU - Hamin, Elisabeth M.
AU - Abunnasr, Yaser
AU - Dilthey, Max Roman
AU - Judge, Pamela K.
AU - Kenney, Melissa A.
AU - Kirshen, Paul
AU - Sheahan, Thomas C.
AU - DeGroot, Don J.
AU - Ryan, Robert L.
AU - McAdoo, Brain G.
AU - Nurse, Leonard
AU - Buxton, Jane A.
AU - Sutton-Grier, Ariana E.
AU - Albright, Elizabeth A.
AU - Marin, Marielos Arlen
AU - Fricke, Rebecca
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2018 by the authors.
PY - 2018/7/26
Y1 - 2018/7/26
N2 - Current and future climate-related coastal impacts such as catastrophic and repetitive flooding, hurricane intensity, and sea level rise necessitate a new approach to developing and managing coastal infrastructure. Traditional "hard" or "grey" engineering solutions are proving both expensive and inflexible in the face of a rapidly changing coastal environment. Hybrid solutions that incorporate natural, nature-based, structural, and non-structural features may better achieve a broad set of goals such as ecological enhancement, long-term adaptation, and social benefits, but broad consideration and uptake of these approaches has been slow. One barrier to the widespread implementation of hybrid solutions is the lack of a relatively quick but holistic evaluation framework that places these broader environmental and societal goals on equal footing with the more traditional goal of exposure reduction. To respond to this need, the Adaptive Gradients Framework was developed and pilot-tested as a qualitative, flexible, and collaborative process guide for organizations to understand, evaluate, and potentially select more diverse kinds of infrastructural responses. These responses would ideally include natural, nature-based, and regulatory/cultural approaches, as well as hybrid designs combining multiple approaches. It enables rapid expert review of project designs based on eight metrics called "gradients", which include exposure reduction, cost efficiency, institutional capacity, ecological enhancement, adaptation over time, greenhouse gas reduction, participatory process, and social benefits. The framework was conceptualized and developed in three phases: relevant factors and barriers were collected from practitioners and experts by survey; these factors were ranked by importance and used to develop the initial framework; several case studies were iteratively evaluated using this technique; and the framework was finalized for implementation. The article presents the framework and a pilot test of its application, along with resources that would enable wider application of the framework by practitioners and theorists.
AB - Current and future climate-related coastal impacts such as catastrophic and repetitive flooding, hurricane intensity, and sea level rise necessitate a new approach to developing and managing coastal infrastructure. Traditional "hard" or "grey" engineering solutions are proving both expensive and inflexible in the face of a rapidly changing coastal environment. Hybrid solutions that incorporate natural, nature-based, structural, and non-structural features may better achieve a broad set of goals such as ecological enhancement, long-term adaptation, and social benefits, but broad consideration and uptake of these approaches has been slow. One barrier to the widespread implementation of hybrid solutions is the lack of a relatively quick but holistic evaluation framework that places these broader environmental and societal goals on equal footing with the more traditional goal of exposure reduction. To respond to this need, the Adaptive Gradients Framework was developed and pilot-tested as a qualitative, flexible, and collaborative process guide for organizations to understand, evaluate, and potentially select more diverse kinds of infrastructural responses. These responses would ideally include natural, nature-based, and regulatory/cultural approaches, as well as hybrid designs combining multiple approaches. It enables rapid expert review of project designs based on eight metrics called "gradients", which include exposure reduction, cost efficiency, institutional capacity, ecological enhancement, adaptation over time, greenhouse gas reduction, participatory process, and social benefits. The framework was conceptualized and developed in three phases: relevant factors and barriers were collected from practitioners and experts by survey; these factors were ranked by importance and used to develop the initial framework; several case studies were iteratively evaluated using this technique; and the framework was finalized for implementation. The article presents the framework and a pilot test of its application, along with resources that would enable wider application of the framework by practitioners and theorists.
KW - Climate adaptation
KW - Co-benefits
KW - Coastal resilience
KW - Coastal restoration
KW - Green infrastructure
KW - Social-ecological systems
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85050481998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85050481998&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/su10082629
DO - 10.3390/su10082629
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85050481998
SN - 2071-1050
VL - 10
SP - 2629
JO - Sustainability (Switzerland)
JF - Sustainability (Switzerland)
IS - 8
M1 - 2629
ER -