TY - JOUR
T1 - Pathology consultation on electronic crossmatch
AU - Mazepa, Marshall A.
AU - Raval, Jay S.
AU - Park, Yara A.
AU - Education Committee of the Academy of Clinical Laboratory Physicians and Scientists
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© American Society for Clinical Pathology.
PY - 2014/5/1
Y1 - 2014/5/1
N2 - Objectives: The full crossmatch is traditionally the final step in compatibility testing, acting as a serologic double check for ABO compatibility and unexpected RBC antibodies. In this review, we discuss the development of electronic crossmatch (EXM), an approach for determining when EXM can be used, and its strengths and weaknesses. Methods: Because EXM relies on highly sensitive screening assays, antibodies are frequently encountered whose clinical significance must be investigated and interpreted. Our approach is to obtain further history, perform enhanced tube testing, and consider tests of immune reactivity or RBC survival. Results: For those without clinically significant antibodies, we found two alternatives: immediate-spin crossmatch (IS XM) and EXM. IS XM is prone to error related to serologic interference, whereas EXM depends on the accuracy of the sample label, accurate data entry, and informatics to avoid errors. Conclusion: EXM is an alternative to the serologic test in patients who have no clinically significant antibodies.
AB - Objectives: The full crossmatch is traditionally the final step in compatibility testing, acting as a serologic double check for ABO compatibility and unexpected RBC antibodies. In this review, we discuss the development of electronic crossmatch (EXM), an approach for determining when EXM can be used, and its strengths and weaknesses. Methods: Because EXM relies on highly sensitive screening assays, antibodies are frequently encountered whose clinical significance must be investigated and interpreted. Our approach is to obtain further history, perform enhanced tube testing, and consider tests of immune reactivity or RBC survival. Results: For those without clinically significant antibodies, we found two alternatives: immediate-spin crossmatch (IS XM) and EXM. IS XM is prone to error related to serologic interference, whereas EXM depends on the accuracy of the sample label, accurate data entry, and informatics to avoid errors. Conclusion: EXM is an alternative to the serologic test in patients who have no clinically significant antibodies.
KW - Crossmatch
KW - EXM
KW - Electronic crossmatch
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84902657084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84902657084&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1309/AJCPZRQIPGZ2XU4V
DO - 10.1309/AJCPZRQIPGZ2XU4V
M3 - Review article
C2 - 24713731
AN - SCOPUS:84902657084
SN - 0002-9173
VL - 141
SP - 618
EP - 624
JO - American journal of clinical pathology
JF - American journal of clinical pathology
IS - 5
ER -