TY - GEN
T1 - Passivity based nonlinear control of hydraulic actuators based on an euler-lagrange formulation
AU - Li, Perry Y.
AU - Wang, Meng
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - A passivity framework for hydraulic actuators is developed by consideration of the compressibility energy function for a fluid with a pressure dependent bulk modulus. The typical actuator's mechanical and pressure dynamic model is shown to be the Euler-Lagrange equations for this energy function. A passivity property for the actuator is exhibited in which the hydraulic supply rate contains the compressibility energy, instead of just being P · Q. A storage function for the pressure error is then proposed based on the physical compressibility energy and the pressure error dynamics is shown to be a passive two-port subsystem. Control laws are derived using the storage function. A case study is presented to compare the new passivity based approach and the traditional backstepping approach for a trajectory tracking application. In this example, the proposed approach is less sensitive to velocity measurement error and requires lower feedback gains than the traditional approach.
AB - A passivity framework for hydraulic actuators is developed by consideration of the compressibility energy function for a fluid with a pressure dependent bulk modulus. The typical actuator's mechanical and pressure dynamic model is shown to be the Euler-Lagrange equations for this energy function. A passivity property for the actuator is exhibited in which the hydraulic supply rate contains the compressibility energy, instead of just being P · Q. A storage function for the pressure error is then proposed based on the physical compressibility energy and the pressure error dynamics is shown to be a passive two-port subsystem. Control laws are derived using the storage function. A case study is presented to compare the new passivity based approach and the traditional backstepping approach for a trajectory tracking application. In this example, the proposed approach is less sensitive to velocity measurement error and requires lower feedback gains than the traditional approach.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881468339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84881468339&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1115/DSCC2011-6197
DO - 10.1115/DSCC2011-6197
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84881468339
SN - 9780791854754
T3 - ASME 2011 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference and Bath/ASME Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, DSCC 2011
SP - 107
EP - 114
BT - ASME 2011 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference and Bath/ASME Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, DSCC 2011
T2 - ASME 2011 Dynamic Systems and Control Conference and Bath/ASME Symposium on Fluid Power and Motion Control, DSCC 2011
Y2 - 31 October 2011 through 2 November 2011
ER -