Abstract
Hodges and Sargent (2001) have developed a measure of a hierarchical model's complexity, degrees of freedom (DF), that is consistent with definitions for scatterplot smoothers, is interpretable in terms of simple models, and enables control of a fit's complexity by means of a prior distribution on complexity. But although DF describes the complexity of the whole fitted model, in general it remains unclear how to allocate DF to individual effects. Here we present a new definition of DF for arbitrary normal-error linear hierarchical models, consistent with that of Hodges and Sargent, that naturally partitions the n observations into DF for individual effects and for error. The new conception of an effect's DF is the ratio of the effect's modeled variance matrix to the total variance matrix. This provides a way to describe the sizes of different parts of a model (e.g., spatial clustering vs. heterogeneity), to place DF-based priors on smoothing parameters, and to describe how a smoothed effect competes with other effects. It also avoids difficulties with the most common definition of DF for residuals. We conclude by comparing DF with the effective number of parameters, pD, of Spiegelhalter et al. (2002). Technical appendices and a data set are available online as supplemental materials.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 124-136 |
Number of pages | 13 |
Journal | Technometrics |
Volume | 52 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Feb 2010 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:This work was supported in part by a Merck Company Foundation Quantitative Sciences Fellowship. The work of Carlin was supported in part by National Cancer Institute grant 2-R01-CA095955-05A2. The authors thank Dr. Bryan Michalowicz of the University of Minnesota School of Dentistry for permission to use the periodontal data and post it on the Technometrics website.
Keywords
- Degrees of freedom
- Hierarchical model
- Model complexity
- Prior distribution