Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Parity or Disparity? Outcomes of Court-Involved Youth With and Without Disabilities

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Youth with disabilities are overrepresented in the juvenile justice system, but few studies have investigated the mechanisms by which this occurs. In this study, we considered how juvenile court adjudication and length of commitment in secure facilities contributed to disproportionality in court involvement and detention, addressing an important gap in the intersection of disability and juvenile justice literature. Using linked educational and juvenile justice records of 41,812 youth, we sought to ascertain whether, among juvenile offenders, youth with disabilities had higher likelihood of adjudication as delinquent or placement in secure facilities for longer periods of time compared to youth without disabilities. Results indicated that youth with and without disabilities were adjudicated and placed similarly, suggesting that disparities contributing to overrepresentation of youth with disabilities in detained populations may manifest earlier in youths’ involvement in the justice system. We conclude with implications for research, policy, and practice.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)368-377
Number of pages10
JournalRemedial and Special Education
Volume41
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2019.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 4 - Quality Education
    SDG 4 Quality Education

Keywords

  • adjudication
  • disabilities
  • disproportionality
  • juvenile court
  • juvenile justice
  • sentencing
  • special education

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Parity or Disparity? Outcomes of Court-Involved Youth With and Without Disabilities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this