Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Parietal cortex is recruited by frontal and cingulate areas to support action monitoring and updating during stopping

  • Jung Uk Kang
  • , Layth Mattar
  • , José Vergara
  • , Victoria E. Gobo
  • , Hernan G. Rey
  • , Sarah R. Heilbronner
  • , Andrew J. Watrous
  • , Benjamin Y. Hayden
  • , Sameer A. Sheth
  • , Eleonora Bartoli

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Recent evidence indicates that the intraparietal sulcus (IPS) may play a causal role in action stopping, potentially representing a novel neuromodulation target for inhibitory control dysfunctions. Here, we leverage intracranial recordings in human subjects to establish the timing and directionality of information flow between IPS and prefrontal and cingulate regions during action stopping. Prior to successful inhibition, information flows primarily from the inferior frontal gyrus (IFG), a critical inhibitory control node, to IPS. In contrast, during stopping errors the communication between IPS and IFG is lacking, and IPS is engaged by posterior cingulate cortex, an area outside of the classical inhibition network and typically associated with default mode. Anterior cingulate and orbitofrontal cortex also display performance-dependent connectivity with IPS. Our functional connectivity results provide direct electrophysiological evidence that IPS is recruited by frontal and anterior cingulate areas to support action plan monitoring and updating, and by posterior cingulate during control failures.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number121288
JournalNeuroImage
Volume315
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 15 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2025 The Authors

Keywords

  • Functional connectivity
  • Inhibitory control
  • Intracranial recording
  • Parietal cortex

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Parietal cortex is recruited by frontal and cingulate areas to support action monitoring and updating during stopping'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this