Parametric analysis as a tool for hypothesis generation: A case study of the Federal Archive Building in New York City

This study investigates the epistemological potentials of parametric analysis for digitally modeling ordinary, existing buildings, addressing a gap in architectural research. While traditional digital modeling prioritizes geometric accuracy, it often limits the ability to generate new architectural insights, treating models as static representations rather than as tools for knowledge production. This research challenges the assumption that geometric accuracy is necessary for epistemological validity, proposing parametric analysis as a hypothesis-generating tool capable of uncovering latent spatial and morphological properties that conventional methods overlook. Using Suárez’s inferential conception of scientific representation as a theoretical framework, this research employs a comparative case study methodology, contrasting direct and parametric digital models of the Federal Archive Building in New York City, analyzing their respective contributions to architectural knowledge. Existing documentation of the Federal Archive Building provides the primary data. The findings reveal that parametric modeling can enable the discovery of latent design properties by facilitating the systematic exploration of geometric variations while maintaining other logics, specifically by demonstrating how certain architectural features accommodate site irregularities while preserving visual coherence. This research advances theoretical discourse by repositioning parametric models from descriptive artifacts to instruments of architectural reasoning, challenging conventional associations between representational accuracy and epistemological validity. Practical applications are suggested in heritage documentation, comparative architectural analysis, and educational contexts where the interpretive exploration of buildings can generate new insights beyond what geometrically accurate models alone can provide.