Paraesophageal hiatal hernia: Is an antireflux procedure necessary?

  • Warren A. Williamson
  • , F. Henry Ellis
  • , John M. Streitz
  • , David M. Shahian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

119 Scopus citations

Abstract

Between January 1970 and October 1992, 119 patients underwent 126 repairs of a paraesophageal hiatal hernia at the Lahey Clinic. Seven patients with a recurrent hernia required reoperation. Of the procedures, 19 (15%) included an antireflux procedure because of severe reflux symptoms and objective evidence of reflux demonstrated by grade 2 esophagitis on endoscopy, manometric evidence of a hypotensive lower esophageal sphincter pressure (≤10 mm Hg), positive results on 24-hour pH monitoring, or all three methods. Follow-up ranged from 6 months to 18 years with a median of 61.5 months, and the results of 115 operations were analyzed. Symptomatic results were good to excellent after 96 (83.5%) of these 115 operations. Thirteen symptomatic paracsophageal hernias recurred in 12 patients (one recurrence per 58 patient-years of follow-up). Severe reflux symptoms accompanied by endoscopic evidence of esophagitis developed in 2 patients who had not undergone an antireflux procedure at the time of repair of the hernia. We conclude that an antireflux procedure is rarely required in patients undergoing repair of a paraesophageal hiatal hernia and should be employed only when objective evidence of reflux is seen preoperatively.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)447-452
Number of pages6
JournalThe Annals of thoracic surgery
Volume56
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1993

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Paraesophageal hiatal hernia: Is an antireflux procedure necessary?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this