TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement using a minimalist approach
AU - Gurevich, Sergey
AU - Oestreich, Brett
AU - Kelly, Rosemary F.
AU - Mbai, Mackenzie
AU - Bertog, Stefan
AU - Ringsred, Karen
AU - Lawton, Annette
AU - Thooft, Brenda
AU - Wagner, Julie
AU - Garcia, Santiago
PY - 2018/3
Y1 - 2018/3
N2 - Background: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is increasingly performed using a minimalist approach under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). The safety of this approach remains controversial and adoption has been low in the US. Methods: The study cohort was comprised of 130 patients (98% male) who underwent TAVR between 4/2015 and 4/2017 at the Minneapolis VA. We compared the outcomes of 81 patients who underwent TAVR using a standard approach (standard TAVR) and 49 who underwent TAVR using a minimalist approach (minimalist TAVR). Outcome measures included device and procedural success, procedural efficiency, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, procedural complications and hospital readmissions. Results: Mean age was 80 (±9) years and median (IQR) STS score was 5 (4–6). Access included transfemoral (n = 111, 85%) and alternative (n = 19, 15%). Minimalist TAVR was associated with reduced procedural time: median 101 min (IQR: 78–135) versus 127 min (IQR: 97–182, p = 0.03), fluoroscopy time: median 18 min (IQR: 12–26) versus 24 min (IQR: 16–38), p = 0.001), contrast volume 90 ml (IQR: 70–120 ml) versus 140 ml (IQR: 86–213 ml, p < 0.001). Conclusions: A minimalistic approach to TAVR is associated with improved procedural efficiency and reduced length of stay without compromising procedural success or clinical outcomes.
AB - Background: Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) is increasingly performed using a minimalist approach under monitored anesthesia care (MAC). The safety of this approach remains controversial and adoption has been low in the US. Methods: The study cohort was comprised of 130 patients (98% male) who underwent TAVR between 4/2015 and 4/2017 at the Minneapolis VA. We compared the outcomes of 81 patients who underwent TAVR using a standard approach (standard TAVR) and 49 who underwent TAVR using a minimalist approach (minimalist TAVR). Outcome measures included device and procedural success, procedural efficiency, length of intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, procedural complications and hospital readmissions. Results: Mean age was 80 (±9) years and median (IQR) STS score was 5 (4–6). Access included transfemoral (n = 111, 85%) and alternative (n = 19, 15%). Minimalist TAVR was associated with reduced procedural time: median 101 min (IQR: 78–135) versus 127 min (IQR: 97–182, p = 0.03), fluoroscopy time: median 18 min (IQR: 12–26) versus 24 min (IQR: 16–38), p = 0.001), contrast volume 90 ml (IQR: 70–120 ml) versus 140 ml (IQR: 86–213 ml, p < 0.001). Conclusions: A minimalistic approach to TAVR is associated with improved procedural efficiency and reduced length of stay without compromising procedural success or clinical outcomes.
KW - Moderate sedation
KW - Outcomes
KW - Transcatheter valve replacement
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028862127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85028862127&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.002
DO - 10.1016/j.carrev.2017.08.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 28923694
AN - SCOPUS:85028862127
SN - 1553-8389
VL - 19
SP - 192
EP - 195
JO - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
JF - Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine
IS - 2
ER -