Outcomes for high-needs patients: Practices with a higher proportion of these patients have an edge

Dori A. Cross, Genna R. Cohen, Christy Harris Lemak, Julia Adler-Milstein

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

High-value primary care for high-needs patients-those with multiple physical, mental, or behavioral health conditions-is critical to improving health system performance. However, little is known about what types of physician practices perform best for high-needs patients. We examined two scale-related characteristics that could predict how well physician practices delivered care to this population: the proportion of patients in the practice that were high-needs and practice size (number of physicians). Using four years of data on commercially insured, high-needs patients in Michigan primary care practices, we found lower spending and utilization among practices with a higher proportion of high-needs patients (more than 10 percent of the practice's panel) compared to practices with smaller proportions. Small practices (those with one or two physicians) had lower overall spending, but not less utilization, compared to large practices. However, practices with a substantial proportion of high-needs patients, as well as small practices, performed slightly worse on a composite measure of process quality than their associated reference group. Practices that treat a high proportion of high-needs patients might have structural advantages or have developed specialized approaches to serve this population. If so, this raises questions about how best to make use of this knowledge to foster high-value care for high-needs patients.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)476-484
Number of pages9
JournalHealth Affairs
Volume36
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2017

Fingerprint

Physicians
Primary Health Care
Process Assessment (Health Care)
Health
Practice Guidelines
Population

Cite this

Outcomes for high-needs patients : Practices with a higher proportion of these patients have an edge. / Cross, Dori A.; Cohen, Genna R.; Lemak, Christy Harris; Adler-Milstein, Julia.

In: Health Affairs, Vol. 36, No. 3, 01.01.2017, p. 476-484.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Cross, Dori A. ; Cohen, Genna R. ; Lemak, Christy Harris ; Adler-Milstein, Julia. / Outcomes for high-needs patients : Practices with a higher proportion of these patients have an edge. In: Health Affairs. 2017 ; Vol. 36, No. 3. pp. 476-484.
@article{104fddbf69394066ab5d3c9a109af8b3,
title = "Outcomes for high-needs patients: Practices with a higher proportion of these patients have an edge",
abstract = "High-value primary care for high-needs patients-those with multiple physical, mental, or behavioral health conditions-is critical to improving health system performance. However, little is known about what types of physician practices perform best for high-needs patients. We examined two scale-related characteristics that could predict how well physician practices delivered care to this population: the proportion of patients in the practice that were high-needs and practice size (number of physicians). Using four years of data on commercially insured, high-needs patients in Michigan primary care practices, we found lower spending and utilization among practices with a higher proportion of high-needs patients (more than 10 percent of the practice's panel) compared to practices with smaller proportions. Small practices (those with one or two physicians) had lower overall spending, but not less utilization, compared to large practices. However, practices with a substantial proportion of high-needs patients, as well as small practices, performed slightly worse on a composite measure of process quality than their associated reference group. Practices that treat a high proportion of high-needs patients might have structural advantages or have developed specialized approaches to serve this population. If so, this raises questions about how best to make use of this knowledge to foster high-value care for high-needs patients.",
author = "Cross, {Dori A.} and Cohen, {Genna R.} and Lemak, {Christy Harris} and Julia Adler-Milstein",
year = "2017",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1309",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "36",
pages = "476--484",
journal = "Health Affairs",
issn = "0278-2715",
publisher = "Project Hope",
number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Outcomes for high-needs patients

T2 - Practices with a higher proportion of these patients have an edge

AU - Cross, Dori A.

AU - Cohen, Genna R.

AU - Lemak, Christy Harris

AU - Adler-Milstein, Julia

PY - 2017/1/1

Y1 - 2017/1/1

N2 - High-value primary care for high-needs patients-those with multiple physical, mental, or behavioral health conditions-is critical to improving health system performance. However, little is known about what types of physician practices perform best for high-needs patients. We examined two scale-related characteristics that could predict how well physician practices delivered care to this population: the proportion of patients in the practice that were high-needs and practice size (number of physicians). Using four years of data on commercially insured, high-needs patients in Michigan primary care practices, we found lower spending and utilization among practices with a higher proportion of high-needs patients (more than 10 percent of the practice's panel) compared to practices with smaller proportions. Small practices (those with one or two physicians) had lower overall spending, but not less utilization, compared to large practices. However, practices with a substantial proportion of high-needs patients, as well as small practices, performed slightly worse on a composite measure of process quality than their associated reference group. Practices that treat a high proportion of high-needs patients might have structural advantages or have developed specialized approaches to serve this population. If so, this raises questions about how best to make use of this knowledge to foster high-value care for high-needs patients.

AB - High-value primary care for high-needs patients-those with multiple physical, mental, or behavioral health conditions-is critical to improving health system performance. However, little is known about what types of physician practices perform best for high-needs patients. We examined two scale-related characteristics that could predict how well physician practices delivered care to this population: the proportion of patients in the practice that were high-needs and practice size (number of physicians). Using four years of data on commercially insured, high-needs patients in Michigan primary care practices, we found lower spending and utilization among practices with a higher proportion of high-needs patients (more than 10 percent of the practice's panel) compared to practices with smaller proportions. Small practices (those with one or two physicians) had lower overall spending, but not less utilization, compared to large practices. However, practices with a substantial proportion of high-needs patients, as well as small practices, performed slightly worse on a composite measure of process quality than their associated reference group. Practices that treat a high proportion of high-needs patients might have structural advantages or have developed specialized approaches to serve this population. If so, this raises questions about how best to make use of this knowledge to foster high-value care for high-needs patients.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014582038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85014582038&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1309

DO - 10.1377/hlthaff.2016.1309

M3 - Article

C2 - 28264949

AN - SCOPUS:85014582038

VL - 36

SP - 476

EP - 484

JO - Health Affairs

JF - Health Affairs

SN - 0278-2715

IS - 3

ER -