TY - JOUR
T1 - Outcomes and costs of community living
T2 - A matched comparison of group homes and semi-independent living
AU - Stancliffe, Roger J.
AU - Keane, Sian
PY - 2000
Y1 - 2000
N2 - Consumer outcomes and recurrent (non-capital) service costs were compared for matched groups of Australian adults with intellectual disability living in group homes or semi-independently. Outcomes examined included quality of life, safety, aloneness, social dissatisfaction, personal care, domestic management, health care, money management, social network, use of mainstream community services, community participation, domestic participation, stability of place of residence, living companion turnover, and natural support. Most outcomes did not differ significantly by group. Where significant differences were evident, participants living semi-independently experienced better outcomes: significantly less social dissatisfaction, more frequent and independent use of community facilities, more participation in domestic tasks, and greater empowerment. There were no outcomes with significantly better results for group home participants. The lower level of staffing provided to semi-independent participants was not associated with poorer outcomes. Per-person expenditure was substantially higher for group home participants.
AB - Consumer outcomes and recurrent (non-capital) service costs were compared for matched groups of Australian adults with intellectual disability living in group homes or semi-independently. Outcomes examined included quality of life, safety, aloneness, social dissatisfaction, personal care, domestic management, health care, money management, social network, use of mainstream community services, community participation, domestic participation, stability of place of residence, living companion turnover, and natural support. Most outcomes did not differ significantly by group. Where significant differences were evident, participants living semi-independently experienced better outcomes: significantly less social dissatisfaction, more frequent and independent use of community facilities, more participation in domestic tasks, and greater empowerment. There were no outcomes with significantly better results for group home participants. The lower level of staffing provided to semi-independent participants was not associated with poorer outcomes. Per-person expenditure was substantially higher for group home participants.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0034533417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0034533417&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/13668250020019584
DO - 10.1080/13668250020019584
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:0034533417
SN - 1326-978X
VL - 25
SP - 281
EP - 305
JO - Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
JF - Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability
IS - 4
ER -