Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Organizational Governance and Trade-Offs Between Pay and Subjective Employee Well-Being: A Comparative Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The incompleteness of labour contracts is expected to cause uncertainty among forward-looking employees as to whether implicit contracts with greater intrinsic rewards in lieu of pay will be breached by employers, thus reducing employee well-being. David Marsden theorized that an organization's form of governance can serve as a stable, easy-to-observe signal of the likelihood of a breach, and thus employees across governance types will exhibit different extrinsic–intrinsic trade-offs. Using the European Working Conditions Survey, we extend Marsden's theory and find supportive evidence across 35 European countries and 9 governance categories. We also extend Marsden's theorizing into the comparative domain and analyse patterns of subjective well-being, compensatory pay and organizational governance across varieties of political economies.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)305-322
Number of pages18
JournalBritish Journal of Industrial Relations
Volume63
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 2025

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 The Author(s). British Journal of Industrial Relations published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Organizational Governance and Trade-Offs Between Pay and Subjective Employee Well-Being: A Comparative Analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this