TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimization of reduced-dose MDCT of thoracic aorta using iterative reconstruction
AU - Töre, Hüseyin Gürkan
AU - Entezari, Pegah
AU - Chalian, Hamid
AU - Gonzalez-Guindalini, Fernanda Dias
AU - Botelho, Marcos Paulo Ferreira
AU - Yaghmai, Vahid
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of iterative reconstruction on image quality of reduced-dose multidetector computed tomography of the thoracic aorta. METHODS: A torso phantom was scanned using two tube potentials (80 and 120 kVp) and five different tube currents (110, 75, 40, 20, and 10 mAs). All images were reconstructed with both filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction. Aortic attenuation, image noise within the thoracic aorta, signal-to-noise ratio, and sharpness of the aortic wall were quantified in the phantom for the two reconstruction algorithms. Data were analyzed using paired t test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The aortic attenuation was similar for FBP and iterative reconstruction (P > 0.05). Image noise level was lower (P < 0.0001), and image sharpness was higher (P = 0.046) with iterative reconstruction. Signal-to-noise ratios were higher with iterative reconstruction compared with those with FBP (P < 0.0001). Signal-to-noise ratio at 80 kVp with iterative reconstruction (9.8 ± 4.4) was similar to the signal-to-noise ratio at 120 kVp with FBP (8.4 ± 3.3) (P = 0.196). CONCLUSIONS: Less image noise and higher image sharpness may be achieved with iterative reconstruction in reduced-dose multidetector computed tomography of the thoracic aorta.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the contribution of iterative reconstruction on image quality of reduced-dose multidetector computed tomography of the thoracic aorta. METHODS: A torso phantom was scanned using two tube potentials (80 and 120 kVp) and five different tube currents (110, 75, 40, 20, and 10 mAs). All images were reconstructed with both filtered back projection (FBP) and iterative reconstruction. Aortic attenuation, image noise within the thoracic aorta, signal-to-noise ratio, and sharpness of the aortic wall were quantified in the phantom for the two reconstruction algorithms. Data were analyzed using paired t test. A value of P < 0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: The aortic attenuation was similar for FBP and iterative reconstruction (P > 0.05). Image noise level was lower (P < 0.0001), and image sharpness was higher (P = 0.046) with iterative reconstruction. Signal-to-noise ratios were higher with iterative reconstruction compared with those with FBP (P < 0.0001). Signal-to-noise ratio at 80 kVp with iterative reconstruction (9.8 ± 4.4) was similar to the signal-to-noise ratio at 120 kVp with FBP (8.4 ± 3.3) (P = 0.196). CONCLUSIONS: Less image noise and higher image sharpness may be achieved with iterative reconstruction in reduced-dose multidetector computed tomography of the thoracic aorta.
KW - Aorta
KW - Filtered back projection
KW - Image quality
KW - Iterative reconstruction
KW - MDCTangiography
KW - Radiation dose reduction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84892878570&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84892878570&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182a213cd
DO - 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3182a213cd
M3 - Article
C2 - 24424557
AN - SCOPUS:84892878570
SN - 0363-8715
VL - 38
SP - 72
EP - 76
JO - Journal of computer assisted tomography
JF - Journal of computer assisted tomography
IS - 1
ER -