TY - JOUR
T1 - Optimization of continuous hydrogen production from co-fermenting molasses with liquid swine manure in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor
AU - Wu, Xiao
AU - Lin, Hongjian
AU - Zhu, Jun
PY - 2013/5
Y1 - 2013/5
N2 - This study investigated and optimized the operational conditions for continuous hydrogen production from sugar beet molasses, co-fermented with liquid swine manure in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Results indicated that pH, HRT and total solids content in the swine manure (TS) had significant impact on all the responses such as biogas production rate (BPR), hydrogen content (HC), hydrogen production rate (HPR), and hydrogen yield (HY), although the highest level of each response was achieved at different combination of the three variables. The maximum BPR, HC, HPR and HY of 32.21L/d, 30.51%, 2.23L/d/L and 1.57mol-H2/mol-sugar were estimated at the optimal pH, HRT, and TS of 5.55, 15.78h, and 0.71% for BPR; 5.22, 12.04, and 0.69 for HC; 5.32, 15.62, and 0.78% for HPR; and 5.36, 17.56, and 0.74% for HY, respectively. Good linear relationships of the predicted and tested results for all the parameters were observed.
AB - This study investigated and optimized the operational conditions for continuous hydrogen production from sugar beet molasses, co-fermented with liquid swine manure in an anaerobic sequencing batch reactor. Results indicated that pH, HRT and total solids content in the swine manure (TS) had significant impact on all the responses such as biogas production rate (BPR), hydrogen content (HC), hydrogen production rate (HPR), and hydrogen yield (HY), although the highest level of each response was achieved at different combination of the three variables. The maximum BPR, HC, HPR and HY of 32.21L/d, 30.51%, 2.23L/d/L and 1.57mol-H2/mol-sugar were estimated at the optimal pH, HRT, and TS of 5.55, 15.78h, and 0.71% for BPR; 5.22, 12.04, and 0.69 for HC; 5.32, 15.62, and 0.78% for HPR; and 5.36, 17.56, and 0.74% for HY, respectively. Good linear relationships of the predicted and tested results for all the parameters were observed.
KW - Hydrogen production rate
KW - Hydrogen yield
KW - Liquid swine manure
KW - Response surface methodology
KW - System optimization
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84876327411
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84876327411#tab=citedBy
U2 - 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.109
DO - 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.02.109
M3 - Article
C2 - 23567702
AN - SCOPUS:84876327411
SN - 0960-8524
VL - 136
SP - 351
EP - 359
JO - Bioresource Technology
JF - Bioresource Technology
ER -