Optimising import risk mitigation: Anticipating the unintended consequences and competing risks of informal trade

Will Hueston, Dominic A Travis, E. Van Klink

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The effectiveness of risk mitigation may be compromised by informal trade, including illegal activities, parallel markets and extra-legal activities. While no regulatory system is 100% effective in eliminating the risk of disease transmission through animal and animal product trade, extreme risk aversion in formal import health regulations may increase informal trade, with the unintended consequence of creating additional risks outside regulatory purview. Optimal risk mitigation on a national scale requires scientifically sound yet flexible mitigation strategies that can address the competing risks of formal and informal trade. More robust risk analysis and creative engagement of nontraditional partners provide avenues for addressing informal trade.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)309-316
Number of pages8
JournalOIE Revue Scientifique et Technique
Volume30
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2011

Fingerprint

risk reduction
imports
animal products
risk analysis
disease transmission
markets
animals

Keywords

  • Competing risk
  • Complex system
  • Informal trade
  • Risk analysis
  • Risk mitigation
  • Trade
  • Unintended consequence

Cite this

Optimising import risk mitigation : Anticipating the unintended consequences and competing risks of informal trade. / Hueston, Will; Travis, Dominic A; Van Klink, E.

In: OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique, Vol. 30, No. 1, 01.01.2011, p. 309-316.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5159cbc0cbdc408fb1a925c778d29cdf,
title = "Optimising import risk mitigation: Anticipating the unintended consequences and competing risks of informal trade",
abstract = "The effectiveness of risk mitigation may be compromised by informal trade, including illegal activities, parallel markets and extra-legal activities. While no regulatory system is 100{\%} effective in eliminating the risk of disease transmission through animal and animal product trade, extreme risk aversion in formal import health regulations may increase informal trade, with the unintended consequence of creating additional risks outside regulatory purview. Optimal risk mitigation on a national scale requires scientifically sound yet flexible mitigation strategies that can address the competing risks of formal and informal trade. More robust risk analysis and creative engagement of nontraditional partners provide avenues for addressing informal trade.",
keywords = "Competing risk, Complex system, Informal trade, Risk analysis, Risk mitigation, Trade, Unintended consequence",
author = "Will Hueston and Travis, {Dominic A} and {Van Klink}, E.",
year = "2011",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.20506/rst.30.1.2028",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "309--316",
journal = "OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique",
issn = "0253-1933",
publisher = "Office International des Epizooties",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimising import risk mitigation

T2 - Anticipating the unintended consequences and competing risks of informal trade

AU - Hueston, Will

AU - Travis, Dominic A

AU - Van Klink, E.

PY - 2011/1/1

Y1 - 2011/1/1

N2 - The effectiveness of risk mitigation may be compromised by informal trade, including illegal activities, parallel markets and extra-legal activities. While no regulatory system is 100% effective in eliminating the risk of disease transmission through animal and animal product trade, extreme risk aversion in formal import health regulations may increase informal trade, with the unintended consequence of creating additional risks outside regulatory purview. Optimal risk mitigation on a national scale requires scientifically sound yet flexible mitigation strategies that can address the competing risks of formal and informal trade. More robust risk analysis and creative engagement of nontraditional partners provide avenues for addressing informal trade.

AB - The effectiveness of risk mitigation may be compromised by informal trade, including illegal activities, parallel markets and extra-legal activities. While no regulatory system is 100% effective in eliminating the risk of disease transmission through animal and animal product trade, extreme risk aversion in formal import health regulations may increase informal trade, with the unintended consequence of creating additional risks outside regulatory purview. Optimal risk mitigation on a national scale requires scientifically sound yet flexible mitigation strategies that can address the competing risks of formal and informal trade. More robust risk analysis and creative engagement of nontraditional partners provide avenues for addressing informal trade.

KW - Competing risk

KW - Complex system

KW - Informal trade

KW - Risk analysis

KW - Risk mitigation

KW - Trade

KW - Unintended consequence

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79960211677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=79960211677&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.20506/rst.30.1.2028

DO - 10.20506/rst.30.1.2028

M3 - Article

C2 - 21809773

AN - SCOPUS:79960211677

VL - 30

SP - 309

EP - 316

JO - OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique

JF - OIE Revue Scientifique et Technique

SN - 0253-1933

IS - 1

ER -