TY - GEN
T1 - Optimal trajectories for a liquid piston compressor/expander in a Compressed Air Energy Storage system with consideration of heat transfer and friction
AU - Saadat, Mohsen
AU - Li, Perry Y.
AU - Simon, Terry W.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2020 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2012
Y1 - 2012
N2 - For a Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) approach to be viable, the air compressor/expander must be sufficiently powerful and efficient. Since efficiency is governed by heat transfer, there is a generally a tradeoff between efficiency and compression/expansion time (or power). In this paper, we determine Pareto optimal compression/expansion profiles for a liquid piston air compressor/expander that maximizes efficiency (power) for a given power (efficiency). Compared to previous works, a numerical optimization approach is proposed that allows for more general heat transfer model, the consideration of the viscous friction, and system limitations in the optimization. The resulting optimal profiles are compared to other trajectories. At compression ratio of 10, the optimal profile results in 10%-40% increase in power density relative to other methods. Optimal geometries that trades off friction and heat transfer improvement can also be determined using this method.
AB - For a Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) approach to be viable, the air compressor/expander must be sufficiently powerful and efficient. Since efficiency is governed by heat transfer, there is a generally a tradeoff between efficiency and compression/expansion time (or power). In this paper, we determine Pareto optimal compression/expansion profiles for a liquid piston air compressor/expander that maximizes efficiency (power) for a given power (efficiency). Compared to previous works, a numerical optimization approach is proposed that allows for more general heat transfer model, the consideration of the viscous friction, and system limitations in the optimization. The resulting optimal profiles are compared to other trajectories. At compression ratio of 10, the optimal profile results in 10%-40% increase in power density relative to other methods. Optimal geometries that trades off friction and heat transfer improvement can also be determined using this method.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84869479553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84869479553&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1109/acc.2012.6315616
DO - 10.1109/acc.2012.6315616
M3 - Conference contribution
AN - SCOPUS:84869479553
SN - 9781457710957
T3 - Proceedings of the American Control Conference
SP - 1800
EP - 1805
BT - 2012 American Control Conference, ACC 2012
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
T2 - 2012 American Control Conference, ACC 2012
Y2 - 27 June 2012 through 29 June 2012
ER -