Optimal groundwater management under climate change and technical progress

Nicolas E. Quintana Ashwell, Jeffrey M Peterson, Nathan P. Hendricks

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

We develop a dynamic model of groundwater extraction for irrigation where climate change and technical change are included as exogenous state variables in addition to the usual state variable of the stock of groundwater. Our key contributions are (i) an intuitive description of the conditions under which groundwater extraction can be non-monotonic, (ii) a numerical demonstration that extraction is non-monotonic in an important region overlying the Ogallala Aquifer, and (iii) the predicted gains from management are substantially larger after accounting for climate and technical change. Intuitively, optimal extraction is increasing in early periods when the marginal benefits of extraction are increasing sufficiently fast due to climate and technical change compared to the increase in the marginal cost of extraction. In contrast, most previous studies include the stock of groundwater as the only state variable and recommend a monotonically decreasing extraction path. We conduct numerical simulations for a region in Kansas overlying the Ogallala Aquifer and find that optimal groundwater extraction peaks 23 years in the future and the gains from management are large (29.5%). Consistent with previous literature, the predicted gains from management are relatively small (6.1%) when ignoring climate and technical change. The realized gains from management are not substantially impacted by incorrect assumptions of climate and technical change when formulating the optimal plan.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)67-83
Number of pages17
JournalResource and Energy Economics
Volume51
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2018

Fingerprint

Groundwater management
Climate change
Technical progress
Ground water
Technical change
State variable
Marginal cost
Numerical simulation
Irrigation

Keywords

  • Climate change
  • Groundwater management
  • Optimal control
  • Technical progress

Cite this

Optimal groundwater management under climate change and technical progress. / Quintana Ashwell, Nicolas E.; Peterson, Jeffrey M; Hendricks, Nathan P.

In: Resource and Energy Economics, Vol. 51, 01.02.2018, p. 67-83.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Quintana Ashwell, Nicolas E. ; Peterson, Jeffrey M ; Hendricks, Nathan P. / Optimal groundwater management under climate change and technical progress. In: Resource and Energy Economics. 2018 ; Vol. 51. pp. 67-83.
@article{947b0023d80c4566a05f3ffc2bb81d6c,
title = "Optimal groundwater management under climate change and technical progress",
abstract = "We develop a dynamic model of groundwater extraction for irrigation where climate change and technical change are included as exogenous state variables in addition to the usual state variable of the stock of groundwater. Our key contributions are (i) an intuitive description of the conditions under which groundwater extraction can be non-monotonic, (ii) a numerical demonstration that extraction is non-monotonic in an important region overlying the Ogallala Aquifer, and (iii) the predicted gains from management are substantially larger after accounting for climate and technical change. Intuitively, optimal extraction is increasing in early periods when the marginal benefits of extraction are increasing sufficiently fast due to climate and technical change compared to the increase in the marginal cost of extraction. In contrast, most previous studies include the stock of groundwater as the only state variable and recommend a monotonically decreasing extraction path. We conduct numerical simulations for a region in Kansas overlying the Ogallala Aquifer and find that optimal groundwater extraction peaks 23 years in the future and the gains from management are large (29.5{\%}). Consistent with previous literature, the predicted gains from management are relatively small (6.1{\%}) when ignoring climate and technical change. The realized gains from management are not substantially impacted by incorrect assumptions of climate and technical change when formulating the optimal plan.",
keywords = "Climate change, Groundwater management, Optimal control, Technical progress",
author = "{Quintana Ashwell}, {Nicolas E.} and Peterson, {Jeffrey M} and Hendricks, {Nathan P.}",
year = "2018",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.10.005",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "51",
pages = "67--83",
journal = "Resources and Energy Economics",
issn = "0928-7655",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Optimal groundwater management under climate change and technical progress

AU - Quintana Ashwell, Nicolas E.

AU - Peterson, Jeffrey M

AU - Hendricks, Nathan P.

PY - 2018/2/1

Y1 - 2018/2/1

N2 - We develop a dynamic model of groundwater extraction for irrigation where climate change and technical change are included as exogenous state variables in addition to the usual state variable of the stock of groundwater. Our key contributions are (i) an intuitive description of the conditions under which groundwater extraction can be non-monotonic, (ii) a numerical demonstration that extraction is non-monotonic in an important region overlying the Ogallala Aquifer, and (iii) the predicted gains from management are substantially larger after accounting for climate and technical change. Intuitively, optimal extraction is increasing in early periods when the marginal benefits of extraction are increasing sufficiently fast due to climate and technical change compared to the increase in the marginal cost of extraction. In contrast, most previous studies include the stock of groundwater as the only state variable and recommend a monotonically decreasing extraction path. We conduct numerical simulations for a region in Kansas overlying the Ogallala Aquifer and find that optimal groundwater extraction peaks 23 years in the future and the gains from management are large (29.5%). Consistent with previous literature, the predicted gains from management are relatively small (6.1%) when ignoring climate and technical change. The realized gains from management are not substantially impacted by incorrect assumptions of climate and technical change when formulating the optimal plan.

AB - We develop a dynamic model of groundwater extraction for irrigation where climate change and technical change are included as exogenous state variables in addition to the usual state variable of the stock of groundwater. Our key contributions are (i) an intuitive description of the conditions under which groundwater extraction can be non-monotonic, (ii) a numerical demonstration that extraction is non-monotonic in an important region overlying the Ogallala Aquifer, and (iii) the predicted gains from management are substantially larger after accounting for climate and technical change. Intuitively, optimal extraction is increasing in early periods when the marginal benefits of extraction are increasing sufficiently fast due to climate and technical change compared to the increase in the marginal cost of extraction. In contrast, most previous studies include the stock of groundwater as the only state variable and recommend a monotonically decreasing extraction path. We conduct numerical simulations for a region in Kansas overlying the Ogallala Aquifer and find that optimal groundwater extraction peaks 23 years in the future and the gains from management are large (29.5%). Consistent with previous literature, the predicted gains from management are relatively small (6.1%) when ignoring climate and technical change. The realized gains from management are not substantially impacted by incorrect assumptions of climate and technical change when formulating the optimal plan.

KW - Climate change

KW - Groundwater management

KW - Optimal control

KW - Technical progress

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85038210353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85038210353&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.10.005

DO - 10.1016/j.reseneeco.2017.10.005

M3 - Article

VL - 51

SP - 67

EP - 83

JO - Resources and Energy Economics

JF - Resources and Energy Economics

SN - 0928-7655

ER -