Abstract
We investigate the joint optimal risk management and capital structure decisions of banks when they use contingent-convertible (CoCo) futures contracts to hedge financial-sector risk. In spite of banks choosing significantly higher leverage ratios, their default probabilities drop appreciably while their equity values increase, allowing banks to compete more favorably with the shadow-banking system. Banks' value-maximizing decision to hedge financial-sector risk unintentionally leads to an economy with extremely low aggregate bank default rates across all future states of nature. Thus, CoCo futures offer a powerful microprudential and macroprudential policy tool. That banks choose not to hedge financial-sector risk in practice is consistent with managers internalizing bank bailouts.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 235-270 |
| Number of pages | 36 |
| Journal | Review of Finance |
| Volume | 28 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Jan 1 2024 |
Bibliographical note
Publisher Copyright:© 2023 The Author(s).
Keywords
- Bailout
- Bank
- Financial crises
- G2
- G21
- G28
- G32
- Risk management
- Too-big-to-fail