Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications

Christopher M. Federico, Damla Ergun, Corrie Hunt

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

15 Scopus citations

Abstract

Individuals with a high need for cognitive closure, or a preference for knowledge that is certain and clear, tend to adopt conservative system-justifying ideologies. Nevertheless, few studies have examined the intervening orientations responsible for this relationship. While conservatism is anchored in values that both support tradition and oppose equality, we suggest that the need for closure is linked primarily with the former. In three studies, we found (a) that the need for closure is more strongly related to support for tradition than opposition to equality, and (b) that the indirect effect of the need for closure on conservatism is stronger via the former than the latter. By clarifying the links between the need for closure and multiple antecedents of ideology, these findings provide new insight into the psychological foundations of political belief by suggesting that the need for closure is not equally relevant to all aspects of system justification.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)524-541
Number of pages18
JournalGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2014

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The authors also thank the Institute for Social Science Research at Arizona State University for funding the CPS survey used in Study 2.

Copyright:
Copyright 2016 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.

Keywords

  • conservatism
  • epistemic motivation
  • ideology
  • system justification

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Opposition to equality and support for tradition as mediators of the relationship between epistemic motivation and system-justifying identifications'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this