TY - JOUR
T1 - Ongoing Teacher Support for Data-Based Individualization
T2 - A Meta-Analysis and Synthesis
AU - Shanahan, Emma
AU - Choi, Seohyeon
AU - An, Jechun
AU - Casey-Wilke, Bess
AU - Birinci, Seyma
AU - Roberts, Caroline
AU - Reno, Emily
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Hammill Institute on Disabilities 2024.
PY - 2025/1/1
Y1 - 2025/1/1
N2 - Although data-based individualization (DBI) has positive effects on learning outcomes for students with learning difficulties, this framework can be difficult for teachers to implement due to its complexity and contextual barriers. The first aim of this synthesis was to investigate the effects of ongoing professional development (PD) support for DBI on teachers’ DBI knowledge, skills, beliefs, and fidelity and the achievement of preschool to Grade 12 students with academic difficulties. The second aim was to report on characteristics of this support and explore whether features were associated with effects. We identified 26 studies, 16 and 22 of which examined teacher and student outcomes, respectively. Meta-analyses indicated that the weighted mean effect size for DBI with ongoing support for teachers was g = 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.43, 1.28], p <.001, I2 = 83.74%, k = 46) and g = 0.31 for students (95% CI = [0.19, 0.42], p <.001, I2 = 61.38%, k = 103). We did not identify moderators of treatment effects. However, subset effects were descriptively larger for ongoing support that targeted data-based instructional changes or included collaborative problem-solving. Researchers may improve future DBI PD by focusing on support for teachers’ instructional changes, describing support practices in greater detail, and advancing technological supports.
AB - Although data-based individualization (DBI) has positive effects on learning outcomes for students with learning difficulties, this framework can be difficult for teachers to implement due to its complexity and contextual barriers. The first aim of this synthesis was to investigate the effects of ongoing professional development (PD) support for DBI on teachers’ DBI knowledge, skills, beliefs, and fidelity and the achievement of preschool to Grade 12 students with academic difficulties. The second aim was to report on characteristics of this support and explore whether features were associated with effects. We identified 26 studies, 16 and 22 of which examined teacher and student outcomes, respectively. Meta-analyses indicated that the weighted mean effect size for DBI with ongoing support for teachers was g = 0.86 (95% confidence interval [CI] = [0.43, 1.28], p <.001, I2 = 83.74%, k = 46) and g = 0.31 for students (95% CI = [0.19, 0.42], p <.001, I2 = 61.38%, k = 103). We did not identify moderators of treatment effects. However, subset effects were descriptively larger for ongoing support that targeted data-based instructional changes or included collaborative problem-solving. Researchers may improve future DBI PD by focusing on support for teachers’ instructional changes, describing support practices in greater detail, and advancing technological supports.
KW - meta-analysis
KW - professional development
KW - response to intervention
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85203364606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85203364606&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/00222194241271335
DO - 10.1177/00222194241271335
M3 - Article
C2 - 39238247
AN - SCOPUS:85203364606
SN - 0022-2194
VL - 58
SP - 3
EP - 18
JO - Journal of Learning Disabilities
JF - Journal of Learning Disabilities
IS - 1
ER -