Abstract
To-date, with the exception of the Newmark method and the midpoint rule, most computational algorithms under the umbrella of LMS methods, which are predominantly employed in research and commercial software lack an in-depth understanding of how to evaluate acceleration computations accurately. Indeed, this is not trivial and much of the literature to-date has several misconceptions and drawbacks because of the lack of a sound theoretical basis and understanding of the fundamental issues. For the first time, we provide a resolution to this issue and point-out several noteworthy perspective to address the correct evaluation of acceleration computations for structural dynamics applications with focus on LMS methods as an illustration.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Journal | Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference |
| State | Published - Jul 4 2008 |
| Event | 49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference - Schaumburg, IL, United States Duration: Apr 7 2008 → Apr 10 2008 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
On the precise evaluation of acceleration computations for general structural dynamic applications : Issues and noteworthy perspectives. / Hoitink, A.; Masuri, S.; Zhou, X.; Tamma, K. K.
In: Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, 04.07.2008.Research output: Contribution to journal › Conference article
}
TY - JOUR
T1 - On the precise evaluation of acceleration computations for general structural dynamic applications
T2 - Issues and noteworthy perspectives
AU - Hoitink, A.
AU - Masuri, S.
AU - Zhou, X.
AU - Tamma, K. K.
PY - 2008/7/4
Y1 - 2008/7/4
N2 - To-date, with the exception of the Newmark method and the midpoint rule, most computational algorithms under the umbrella of LMS methods, which are predominantly employed in research and commercial software lack an in-depth understanding of how to evaluate acceleration computations accurately. Indeed, this is not trivial and much of the literature to-date has several misconceptions and drawbacks because of the lack of a sound theoretical basis and understanding of the fundamental issues. For the first time, we provide a resolution to this issue and point-out several noteworthy perspective to address the correct evaluation of acceleration computations for structural dynamics applications with focus on LMS methods as an illustration.
AB - To-date, with the exception of the Newmark method and the midpoint rule, most computational algorithms under the umbrella of LMS methods, which are predominantly employed in research and commercial software lack an in-depth understanding of how to evaluate acceleration computations accurately. Indeed, this is not trivial and much of the literature to-date has several misconceptions and drawbacks because of the lack of a sound theoretical basis and understanding of the fundamental issues. For the first time, we provide a resolution to this issue and point-out several noteworthy perspective to address the correct evaluation of acceleration computations for structural dynamics applications with focus on LMS methods as an illustration.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=77957812900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=77957812900&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
JO - Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
JF - Collection of Technical Papers - AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference
SN - 0273-4508
ER -