On the difficulties of integrating evidence from fMRI and electrophysiology in cognitive neuroscience

Benjamin Y. Hayden, Michael L. Platt

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and single unit physiology are two of the most widely-used methods in cognitive neuroscience and neuroeconomics. Despite the fact that practitioners of both methods share a common goal - understanding the mechanisms underlying behaviour and cognition - their efforts are rarely directly linked. This chapter considers some of the reasons for apparent discrepancies between findings of fMRI and electrophysiological studies. It examines these problems through the lens of two case studies - decision making under uncertainty and fictive learning - derived from personal research. Despite this narrow focus, these arguments can extend to other areas of study. It is shown that major differences in the neural events measured by the two methods, the behavioural techniques employed with animal and human subjects, and the intellectual history and unique culture of each discipline, contribute to difficulties in providing a wholly synthetic account of the mechanisms underlying cognition and decision making. These observations endorse more collaborative efforts conducting parallel research using analogous, if not identical, behavioural techniques using both brain imaging and single unit physiology.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Title of host publicationDecision Making, Affect, and Learning
Subtitle of host publicationAttention and Performance XXIII
PublisherOxford University Press
ISBN (Electronic)9780191725623
ISBN (Print)9780199600434
DOIs
StatePublished - May 1 2011

Fingerprint

Electrophysiology
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Cognition
Decision Making
Research
Neuroimaging
Lenses
Uncertainty
History
Learning
Cognitive Neuroscience

Keywords

  • Cognition
  • Decision making
  • Electrophysical studies
  • Fictive learning
  • Fmri
  • Functional magnetic resonance imaging

Cite this

Hayden, B. Y., & Platt, M. L. (2011). On the difficulties of integrating evidence from fMRI and electrophysiology in cognitive neuroscience. In Decision Making, Affect, and Learning: Attention and Performance XXIII Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600434.003.0006

On the difficulties of integrating evidence from fMRI and electrophysiology in cognitive neuroscience. / Hayden, Benjamin Y.; Platt, Michael L.

Decision Making, Affect, and Learning: Attention and Performance XXIII. Oxford University Press, 2011.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingChapter

Hayden, BY & Platt, ML 2011, On the difficulties of integrating evidence from fMRI and electrophysiology in cognitive neuroscience. in Decision Making, Affect, and Learning: Attention and Performance XXIII. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600434.003.0006
Hayden BY, Platt ML. On the difficulties of integrating evidence from fMRI and electrophysiology in cognitive neuroscience. In Decision Making, Affect, and Learning: Attention and Performance XXIII. Oxford University Press. 2011 https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600434.003.0006
Hayden, Benjamin Y. ; Platt, Michael L. / On the difficulties of integrating evidence from fMRI and electrophysiology in cognitive neuroscience. Decision Making, Affect, and Learning: Attention and Performance XXIII. Oxford University Press, 2011.
@inbook{aef724f696b841a991d534726d4b7faf,
title = "On the difficulties of integrating evidence from fMRI and electrophysiology in cognitive neuroscience",
abstract = "Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and single unit physiology are two of the most widely-used methods in cognitive neuroscience and neuroeconomics. Despite the fact that practitioners of both methods share a common goal - understanding the mechanisms underlying behaviour and cognition - their efforts are rarely directly linked. This chapter considers some of the reasons for apparent discrepancies between findings of fMRI and electrophysiological studies. It examines these problems through the lens of two case studies - decision making under uncertainty and fictive learning - derived from personal research. Despite this narrow focus, these arguments can extend to other areas of study. It is shown that major differences in the neural events measured by the two methods, the behavioural techniques employed with animal and human subjects, and the intellectual history and unique culture of each discipline, contribute to difficulties in providing a wholly synthetic account of the mechanisms underlying cognition and decision making. These observations endorse more collaborative efforts conducting parallel research using analogous, if not identical, behavioural techniques using both brain imaging and single unit physiology.",
keywords = "Cognition, Decision making, Electrophysical studies, Fictive learning, Fmri, Functional magnetic resonance imaging",
author = "Hayden, {Benjamin Y.} and Platt, {Michael L.}",
year = "2011",
month = "5",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600434.003.0006",
language = "English (US)",
isbn = "9780199600434",
booktitle = "Decision Making, Affect, and Learning",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
address = "United States",

}

TY - CHAP

T1 - On the difficulties of integrating evidence from fMRI and electrophysiology in cognitive neuroscience

AU - Hayden, Benjamin Y.

AU - Platt, Michael L.

PY - 2011/5/1

Y1 - 2011/5/1

N2 - Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and single unit physiology are two of the most widely-used methods in cognitive neuroscience and neuroeconomics. Despite the fact that practitioners of both methods share a common goal - understanding the mechanisms underlying behaviour and cognition - their efforts are rarely directly linked. This chapter considers some of the reasons for apparent discrepancies between findings of fMRI and electrophysiological studies. It examines these problems through the lens of two case studies - decision making under uncertainty and fictive learning - derived from personal research. Despite this narrow focus, these arguments can extend to other areas of study. It is shown that major differences in the neural events measured by the two methods, the behavioural techniques employed with animal and human subjects, and the intellectual history and unique culture of each discipline, contribute to difficulties in providing a wholly synthetic account of the mechanisms underlying cognition and decision making. These observations endorse more collaborative efforts conducting parallel research using analogous, if not identical, behavioural techniques using both brain imaging and single unit physiology.

AB - Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) and single unit physiology are two of the most widely-used methods in cognitive neuroscience and neuroeconomics. Despite the fact that practitioners of both methods share a common goal - understanding the mechanisms underlying behaviour and cognition - their efforts are rarely directly linked. This chapter considers some of the reasons for apparent discrepancies between findings of fMRI and electrophysiological studies. It examines these problems through the lens of two case studies - decision making under uncertainty and fictive learning - derived from personal research. Despite this narrow focus, these arguments can extend to other areas of study. It is shown that major differences in the neural events measured by the two methods, the behavioural techniques employed with animal and human subjects, and the intellectual history and unique culture of each discipline, contribute to difficulties in providing a wholly synthetic account of the mechanisms underlying cognition and decision making. These observations endorse more collaborative efforts conducting parallel research using analogous, if not identical, behavioural techniques using both brain imaging and single unit physiology.

KW - Cognition

KW - Decision making

KW - Electrophysical studies

KW - Fictive learning

KW - Fmri

KW - Functional magnetic resonance imaging

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84921657391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84921657391&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600434.003.0006

DO - 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199600434.003.0006

M3 - Chapter

AN - SCOPUS:84921657391

SN - 9780199600434

BT - Decision Making, Affect, and Learning

PB - Oxford University Press

ER -