TY - JOUR
T1 - On the consistency of the combinatorial codifferential
AU - Arnold, Douglas N.
AU - Falk, Richard S.
AU - Guzmán, Johnny
AU - Tsogtgerel, Gantumur
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 American Mathematical Society.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - In 1976, Dodziuk and Patodi employed Whitney forms to define a combinatorial codifferential operator on cochains, and they raised the question whether it is consistent in the sense that for a smooth enough differential form the combinatorial codifferential of the associated cochain converges to the exterior codifferential of the form as the triangulation is refined. In 1991, Smits proved this to be the case for the combinatorial codifferential applied to 1-forms in two dimensions under the additional assumption that the initial triangulation is refined in a completely regular fashion, by dividing each triangle into four similar triangles. In this paper we extend the result of Smits to arbitrary dimensions, showing that the combinatorial codifferential on 1-forms is consistent if the triangulations are uniform or piecewise uniform in a certain precise sense. We also show that this restriction on the triangulations is needed, giving a counterexample in which a different regular refinement procedure, namely Whitney’s standard subdivision, is used. Further, we show by numerical example that for 2-forms in three dimensions, the combinatorial codifferential is not consistent, even for the most regular subdivision process.
AB - In 1976, Dodziuk and Patodi employed Whitney forms to define a combinatorial codifferential operator on cochains, and they raised the question whether it is consistent in the sense that for a smooth enough differential form the combinatorial codifferential of the associated cochain converges to the exterior codifferential of the form as the triangulation is refined. In 1991, Smits proved this to be the case for the combinatorial codifferential applied to 1-forms in two dimensions under the additional assumption that the initial triangulation is refined in a completely regular fashion, by dividing each triangle into four similar triangles. In this paper we extend the result of Smits to arbitrary dimensions, showing that the combinatorial codifferential on 1-forms is consistent if the triangulations are uniform or piecewise uniform in a certain precise sense. We also show that this restriction on the triangulations is needed, giving a counterexample in which a different regular refinement procedure, namely Whitney’s standard subdivision, is used. Further, we show by numerical example that for 2-forms in three dimensions, the combinatorial codifferential is not consistent, even for the most regular subdivision process.
KW - Combinatorial codifferential
KW - Consistency
KW - Finite element
KW - Whitney form
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84924786951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84924786951&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1090/S0002-9947-2014-06134-5
DO - 10.1090/S0002-9947-2014-06134-5
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84924786951
SN - 0002-9947
VL - 366
SP - 5487
EP - 5502
JO - Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
JF - Transactions of the American Mathematical Society
IS - 10
ER -