On the Conceptual Ambiguity Surrounding Perceived Message Effectiveness

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Health message quality is best understood in terms of a message’s ability to effectively produce change in the variables that it was designed to change. The importance of determining a message’s effectiveness in producing change prior to implementation is clear: The better a message’s potential effectiveness is understood, the better able interventionists are to distinguish effective from ineffective messages before allocating scarce resources to message implementation. For this purpose, research has relied on perceived message effectiveness measures as a proxy of a message’s potential effectiveness. Remarkably, however, very little conceptual work has been done on perceived message effectiveness, which renders its measures underinformed and inconsistent across studies. To encourage greater conceptual work on this important construct, we review several threats to the validity of existing measures and consider strategies for improving our understanding of perceived message effectiveness.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)125-134
Number of pages10
JournalHealth communication
Volume30
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 1 2015

Fingerprint

Proxy
Health
Research
threat
ability
health
resources

Cite this

On the Conceptual Ambiguity Surrounding Perceived Message Effectiveness. / Yzer, Marco; LoRusso, Susan M; Nagler, Rebekah H.

In: Health communication, Vol. 30, No. 2, 01.02.2015, p. 125-134.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{3428e9d96e194030b3f84c7e0be6f03f,
title = "On the Conceptual Ambiguity Surrounding Perceived Message Effectiveness",
abstract = "Health message quality is best understood in terms of a message’s ability to effectively produce change in the variables that it was designed to change. The importance of determining a message’s effectiveness in producing change prior to implementation is clear: The better a message’s potential effectiveness is understood, the better able interventionists are to distinguish effective from ineffective messages before allocating scarce resources to message implementation. For this purpose, research has relied on perceived message effectiveness measures as a proxy of a message’s potential effectiveness. Remarkably, however, very little conceptual work has been done on perceived message effectiveness, which renders its measures underinformed and inconsistent across studies. To encourage greater conceptual work on this important construct, we review several threats to the validity of existing measures and consider strategies for improving our understanding of perceived message effectiveness.",
author = "Marco Yzer and LoRusso, {Susan M} and Nagler, {Rebekah H}",
year = "2015",
month = "2",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1080/10410236.2014.974131",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "30",
pages = "125--134",
journal = "Health Communication",
issn = "1041-0236",
publisher = "Routledge",
number = "2",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - On the Conceptual Ambiguity Surrounding Perceived Message Effectiveness

AU - Yzer, Marco

AU - LoRusso, Susan M

AU - Nagler, Rebekah H

PY - 2015/2/1

Y1 - 2015/2/1

N2 - Health message quality is best understood in terms of a message’s ability to effectively produce change in the variables that it was designed to change. The importance of determining a message’s effectiveness in producing change prior to implementation is clear: The better a message’s potential effectiveness is understood, the better able interventionists are to distinguish effective from ineffective messages before allocating scarce resources to message implementation. For this purpose, research has relied on perceived message effectiveness measures as a proxy of a message’s potential effectiveness. Remarkably, however, very little conceptual work has been done on perceived message effectiveness, which renders its measures underinformed and inconsistent across studies. To encourage greater conceptual work on this important construct, we review several threats to the validity of existing measures and consider strategies for improving our understanding of perceived message effectiveness.

AB - Health message quality is best understood in terms of a message’s ability to effectively produce change in the variables that it was designed to change. The importance of determining a message’s effectiveness in producing change prior to implementation is clear: The better a message’s potential effectiveness is understood, the better able interventionists are to distinguish effective from ineffective messages before allocating scarce resources to message implementation. For this purpose, research has relied on perceived message effectiveness measures as a proxy of a message’s potential effectiveness. Remarkably, however, very little conceptual work has been done on perceived message effectiveness, which renders its measures underinformed and inconsistent across studies. To encourage greater conceptual work on this important construct, we review several threats to the validity of existing measures and consider strategies for improving our understanding of perceived message effectiveness.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84914162835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84914162835&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/10410236.2014.974131

DO - 10.1080/10410236.2014.974131

M3 - Article

VL - 30

SP - 125

EP - 134

JO - Health Communication

JF - Health Communication

SN - 1041-0236

IS - 2

ER -