Occurrence of contaminants of emerging concern in aquatic ecosystems utilized by Minnesota tribal communities

Jessica R. Deere, Seth Moore, Mark Ferrey, Mark D. Jankowski, Alexander Primus, Matteo Convertino, Joseph L. Servadio, Nicholas B.D. Phelps, M. Coreen Hamilton, Yvette Chenaux-Ibrahim, Dominic A. Travis, Tiffany M. Wolf

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

31 Scopus citations

Abstract

Pharmaceuticals, personal care products, hormones, and other chemicals lacking water quality standards are frequently found in surface water. While evidence is growing that these contaminants of emerging concern (CECs) – those previously unknown, unrecognized, or unregulated – can affect the behavior and reproduction of fish and wildlife, little is known about the distribution of these chemicals in rural, tribal areas. Therefore, we surveyed the presence of CECs in water, sediment, and subsistence fish species across various waterbodies, categorized as undeveloped (i.e., no human development along shorelines), developed (i.e., human development along shorelines), and wastewater effluent-impacted (i.e., contain effluence from wastewater treatment plants), within the Grand Portage Indian Reservation and 1854 Ceded Territory in northeastern Minnesota, U.S.A. Overall, in 28 sites across three years (2016–2018), 117 of the 158 compounds tested were detected in at least one form of medium (i.e., water, sediment, or fish). CECs were detected most frequently at wastewater effluent-impacted sites, with up to 83 chemicals detected in one such lake, while as many as 17 were detected in an undeveloped lake. Although there was no statistically significant difference between the number of CECs present in developed versus undeveloped lakes, a range of 3–17 CECs were detected across these locations. Twenty-two CECs were detected in developed and undeveloped sites that were not detected in wastewater effluent-impacted sites. The detection of CECs in remote, undeveloped locations, where subsistence fish are harvested, raises scientific questions about the safety and security of subsistence foods for indigenous communities. Further investigation is warranted so that science-based solutions to reduce chemical risks to aquatic life and people can be developed locally and be informative for indigenous communities elsewhere.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number138057
JournalScience of the Total Environment
Volume724
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 1 2020

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
We are grateful to the Grand Portage Reservation Tribal Council and Tony Swader for their continued support of this ongoing research. We thank the participants of the initial workshop that initiated the project. Many thanks to Leila Knoll and Aidan Neher for assistance in the field. We thank Ben Blair for insight and direction on manuscript development and Dennis Helsel for assistance on Kaplan-Meier statistics. M.C. acknowledges the funding from the GI-CoRE Station for Big Data & Cybersecurity at Hokkaido University (Sapporo, JP) and the Microsoft AI for Earth Program grant "Bio-Hydro-Geo Dynamics: Mapping Systemic Earth Risk." Funding support comes from University of Minnesota College of Veterinary Medicine's Population Systems Signature Program and UMN Agriculture Experiment Station Rsearch Funds ( MIN-62-061 ), the Environmental Protection Agency 's Great Lakes Restoration Initiative, and the Environment and Natural Resources Trust Fund as recommended by the Legislative-Citizen Commission on Minnesota Resources (M.L. 2017, Chp. 96, Sec. 2, Subd. 04g).

Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.

Keywords

  • Aquatic toxicology
  • Chemicals of emerging concern
  • Ecosystem health
  • Indigenous peoples
  • Personal care products
  • Pharmaceuticals

PubMed: MeSH publication types

  • Journal Article

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Occurrence of contaminants of emerging concern in aquatic ecosystems utilized by Minnesota tribal communities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this