Occupied Okinawa on the edge: On being Okinawan in Hawai'i and U.S. Colonialism toward Okinawa

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This essay unpacks the work of imagining a new identity among Okinawan immigrants in Hawai'i in the late 1940s and early 1950s. During this period, they negotiated the nearness of their homeland under U.S. occupation, all the while pursuing the promise of becoming U.S. citizens buoyed by immigration reform and the Hawaiian statehood campaign. Traversing the liminal space of being a citizen and an immigrant, they constructed the stories of their future to ponder the significance of occupied Okinawa on their legal status in Hawai'i. Such concrete engagement challenged and confounded the normative idiom of what it meant to be a sovereign subject. Yet equally important was law's role in suppressing the Okinawan immigrant sense of history and human agency. This dialectic is immanent in the little-known case United States v. Ushi Shiroma (1954), and its critique lays bare occupied Okinawa on the edge of U.S. imperial sovereignty.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)741-765
Number of pages25
JournalAmerican Quarterly
Volume64
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Dec 1 2012

Fingerprint

colonial age
immigrant
US citizen
statehood
legal status
dialectics
Homelands
sovereignty
immigration
campaign
citizen
reform
Law
history
Colonialism
Hawai'i
Okinawa
Immigrants

Cite this

Occupied Okinawa on the edge : On being Okinawan in Hawai'i and U.S. Colonialism toward Okinawa. / Onishi, Yuichiro.

In: American Quarterly, Vol. 64, No. 4, 01.12.2012, p. 741-765.

Research output: Contribution to journalReview article

@article{e872d12475494d878d5fc02619c21c85,
title = "Occupied Okinawa on the edge: On being Okinawan in Hawai'i and U.S. Colonialism toward Okinawa",
abstract = "This essay unpacks the work of imagining a new identity among Okinawan immigrants in Hawai'i in the late 1940s and early 1950s. During this period, they negotiated the nearness of their homeland under U.S. occupation, all the while pursuing the promise of becoming U.S. citizens buoyed by immigration reform and the Hawaiian statehood campaign. Traversing the liminal space of being a citizen and an immigrant, they constructed the stories of their future to ponder the significance of occupied Okinawa on their legal status in Hawai'i. Such concrete engagement challenged and confounded the normative idiom of what it meant to be a sovereign subject. Yet equally important was law's role in suppressing the Okinawan immigrant sense of history and human agency. This dialectic is immanent in the little-known case United States v. Ushi Shiroma (1954), and its critique lays bare occupied Okinawa on the edge of U.S. imperial sovereignty.",
author = "Yuichiro Onishi",
year = "2012",
month = "12",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1353/aq.2012.0056",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "64",
pages = "741--765",
journal = "American Quarterly",
issn = "0003-0678",
publisher = "Johns Hopkins University Press",
number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Occupied Okinawa on the edge

T2 - On being Okinawan in Hawai'i and U.S. Colonialism toward Okinawa

AU - Onishi, Yuichiro

PY - 2012/12/1

Y1 - 2012/12/1

N2 - This essay unpacks the work of imagining a new identity among Okinawan immigrants in Hawai'i in the late 1940s and early 1950s. During this period, they negotiated the nearness of their homeland under U.S. occupation, all the while pursuing the promise of becoming U.S. citizens buoyed by immigration reform and the Hawaiian statehood campaign. Traversing the liminal space of being a citizen and an immigrant, they constructed the stories of their future to ponder the significance of occupied Okinawa on their legal status in Hawai'i. Such concrete engagement challenged and confounded the normative idiom of what it meant to be a sovereign subject. Yet equally important was law's role in suppressing the Okinawan immigrant sense of history and human agency. This dialectic is immanent in the little-known case United States v. Ushi Shiroma (1954), and its critique lays bare occupied Okinawa on the edge of U.S. imperial sovereignty.

AB - This essay unpacks the work of imagining a new identity among Okinawan immigrants in Hawai'i in the late 1940s and early 1950s. During this period, they negotiated the nearness of their homeland under U.S. occupation, all the while pursuing the promise of becoming U.S. citizens buoyed by immigration reform and the Hawaiian statehood campaign. Traversing the liminal space of being a citizen and an immigrant, they constructed the stories of their future to ponder the significance of occupied Okinawa on their legal status in Hawai'i. Such concrete engagement challenged and confounded the normative idiom of what it meant to be a sovereign subject. Yet equally important was law's role in suppressing the Okinawan immigrant sense of history and human agency. This dialectic is immanent in the little-known case United States v. Ushi Shiroma (1954), and its critique lays bare occupied Okinawa on the edge of U.S. imperial sovereignty.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84871994676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84871994676&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1353/aq.2012.0056

DO - 10.1353/aq.2012.0056

M3 - Review article

AN - SCOPUS:84871994676

VL - 64

SP - 741

EP - 765

JO - American Quarterly

JF - American Quarterly

SN - 0003-0678

IS - 4

ER -