Observations on reproductive effort in British erpobdellid and glossiphonid leeches with different life cycles.

P. Calow, H. Riley

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    12 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Examined Erpobdella octoculata from an annual population, E. octoculata from a presumed biennial population and E. testacea from a presumed annual population; and Glossiphonia heteroclita and Helobdella stagnalis, both annual and predatory, Glossiphonia complanata, presumed perennial and predatory, and Theromyzon tessulatum and Hemiclepsis marginata, both ectoparasitic. The erpobdellids laid cocoons which they deserted; the glossiphoniids brooded their eggs and carried their offspring. Reproductive effort was measured in terms of offspring production per parent. On this basis the annual erpobdellids invested more in reproduction than the biennial populations. After correcting for size differences, Helobdella stagnalis and G. heteroclita carried a larger number of offspring than G. complanata. Differences were less obvious when brood sizes were expressed as live weights. Using laboratory data, reproductive effort was also measured for erpobdellids in terms of the energy investment and the sacrifice of parent biomass to gametes. On those criteria, E. testacea invested more in reproduction than any E. octoculata. Brooding leeches ingested less food per unit time than non-brooding equivalents and this was most marked in short-lived species. Brooding leeches also suffered a larger proportional reduction in weight than non-brooding ones, again most marked in short-lived species. -from Authors

    Original languageEnglish (US)
    Pages (from-to)697-712
    Number of pages16
    JournalJournal of Animal Ecology
    Volume51
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Jan 1 1982

    Fingerprint

    leech
    reproductive effort
    Hirudinea
    life cycle (organisms)
    life cycle
    brood size
    cocoon
    gamete
    cocoons
    egg
    germ cells
    weight loss
    food
    biomass
    body weight
    energy
    brooding

    Cite this

    Observations on reproductive effort in British erpobdellid and glossiphonid leeches with different life cycles. / Calow, P.; Riley, H.

    In: Journal of Animal Ecology, Vol. 51, No. 3, 01.01.1982, p. 697-712.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

    @article{601976d002b54c50b4079c2f929c0bf4,
    title = "Observations on reproductive effort in British erpobdellid and glossiphonid leeches with different life cycles.",
    abstract = "Examined Erpobdella octoculata from an annual population, E. octoculata from a presumed biennial population and E. testacea from a presumed annual population; and Glossiphonia heteroclita and Helobdella stagnalis, both annual and predatory, Glossiphonia complanata, presumed perennial and predatory, and Theromyzon tessulatum and Hemiclepsis marginata, both ectoparasitic. The erpobdellids laid cocoons which they deserted; the glossiphoniids brooded their eggs and carried their offspring. Reproductive effort was measured in terms of offspring production per parent. On this basis the annual erpobdellids invested more in reproduction than the biennial populations. After correcting for size differences, Helobdella stagnalis and G. heteroclita carried a larger number of offspring than G. complanata. Differences were less obvious when brood sizes were expressed as live weights. Using laboratory data, reproductive effort was also measured for erpobdellids in terms of the energy investment and the sacrifice of parent biomass to gametes. On those criteria, E. testacea invested more in reproduction than any E. octoculata. Brooding leeches ingested less food per unit time than non-brooding equivalents and this was most marked in short-lived species. Brooding leeches also suffered a larger proportional reduction in weight than non-brooding ones, again most marked in short-lived species. -from Authors",
    author = "P. Calow and H. Riley",
    year = "1982",
    month = "1",
    day = "1",
    doi = "10.2307/3999",
    language = "English (US)",
    volume = "51",
    pages = "697--712",
    journal = "Journal of Animal Ecology",
    issn = "0021-8790",
    publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
    number = "3",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Observations on reproductive effort in British erpobdellid and glossiphonid leeches with different life cycles.

    AU - Calow, P.

    AU - Riley, H.

    PY - 1982/1/1

    Y1 - 1982/1/1

    N2 - Examined Erpobdella octoculata from an annual population, E. octoculata from a presumed biennial population and E. testacea from a presumed annual population; and Glossiphonia heteroclita and Helobdella stagnalis, both annual and predatory, Glossiphonia complanata, presumed perennial and predatory, and Theromyzon tessulatum and Hemiclepsis marginata, both ectoparasitic. The erpobdellids laid cocoons which they deserted; the glossiphoniids brooded their eggs and carried their offspring. Reproductive effort was measured in terms of offspring production per parent. On this basis the annual erpobdellids invested more in reproduction than the biennial populations. After correcting for size differences, Helobdella stagnalis and G. heteroclita carried a larger number of offspring than G. complanata. Differences were less obvious when brood sizes were expressed as live weights. Using laboratory data, reproductive effort was also measured for erpobdellids in terms of the energy investment and the sacrifice of parent biomass to gametes. On those criteria, E. testacea invested more in reproduction than any E. octoculata. Brooding leeches ingested less food per unit time than non-brooding equivalents and this was most marked in short-lived species. Brooding leeches also suffered a larger proportional reduction in weight than non-brooding ones, again most marked in short-lived species. -from Authors

    AB - Examined Erpobdella octoculata from an annual population, E. octoculata from a presumed biennial population and E. testacea from a presumed annual population; and Glossiphonia heteroclita and Helobdella stagnalis, both annual and predatory, Glossiphonia complanata, presumed perennial and predatory, and Theromyzon tessulatum and Hemiclepsis marginata, both ectoparasitic. The erpobdellids laid cocoons which they deserted; the glossiphoniids brooded their eggs and carried their offspring. Reproductive effort was measured in terms of offspring production per parent. On this basis the annual erpobdellids invested more in reproduction than the biennial populations. After correcting for size differences, Helobdella stagnalis and G. heteroclita carried a larger number of offspring than G. complanata. Differences were less obvious when brood sizes were expressed as live weights. Using laboratory data, reproductive effort was also measured for erpobdellids in terms of the energy investment and the sacrifice of parent biomass to gametes. On those criteria, E. testacea invested more in reproduction than any E. octoculata. Brooding leeches ingested less food per unit time than non-brooding equivalents and this was most marked in short-lived species. Brooding leeches also suffered a larger proportional reduction in weight than non-brooding ones, again most marked in short-lived species. -from Authors

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0020469523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0020469523&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.2307/3999

    DO - 10.2307/3999

    M3 - Article

    VL - 51

    SP - 697

    EP - 712

    JO - Journal of Animal Ecology

    JF - Journal of Animal Ecology

    SN - 0021-8790

    IS - 3

    ER -