Obfuscating transparency?

Michael Aschner, Herman Autrup, Colin L. Berry, Alan R. Boobis, Samuel M. Cohen, Wolfgang Dekant, Corrado L. Galli, Jay I. Goodman, Gio B. Gori, Helmut A. Greim, Norbert E. Kaminski, Curtis D. Klaassen, James E. Klaunig, Marcello Lotti, Hans WJ Marquardt, Angelo Moretto, Olavi Pelkonen, I. Glenn Sipes, Kendall B. Wallace, Hiroshi Yamazaki

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Abstract

Several recent and prominent articles in Science and Nature deliberately mischaracterized the nature of genuine scientific evidence. Those articles take issue with the United States Environmental Protection Agency's recent proposal to structure its policies and rules only from studies with transparently published raw data. The articles claim it is an effort to obfuscate with transparency, by eliminating a host of studies not offering raw data. A remarkable declaration by a Science editorial is that properly trained experts can verify the scientific evidence of studies without access to raw data, We assert the Agency's proposal must be sustained. Transparency in reporting is a fundamental ethical imperative of objective scientific research justifying massive official regulations and policies. Putative hazards bereft of independent scientific evidence will continue to stoke public anxieties, calling for precautionary regulations and policies. These should rely not on spurious science but on transparent tradeoffs between the smallest exposures compatible with utility and with social perceptions of affordable precaution.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)A1-A3
JournalRegulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology
Volume97
DOIs
StatePublished - Aug 2018

Fingerprint

Transparency
Environmental Protection Agency
Social Perception
United States Environmental Protection Agency
Hazards
Anxiety
Research

Cite this

Aschner, M., Autrup, H., Berry, C. L., Boobis, A. R., Cohen, S. M., Dekant, W., ... Yamazaki, H. (2018). Obfuscating transparency? Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, 97, A1-A3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.004

Obfuscating transparency? / Aschner, Michael; Autrup, Herman; Berry, Colin L.; Boobis, Alan R.; Cohen, Samuel M.; Dekant, Wolfgang; Galli, Corrado L.; Goodman, Jay I.; Gori, Gio B.; Greim, Helmut A.; Kaminski, Norbert E.; Klaassen, Curtis D.; Klaunig, James E.; Lotti, Marcello; Marquardt, Hans WJ; Moretto, Angelo; Pelkonen, Olavi; Sipes, I. Glenn; Wallace, Kendall B.; Yamazaki, Hiroshi.

In: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, Vol. 97, 08.2018, p. A1-A3.

Research output: Contribution to journalEditorial

Aschner, M, Autrup, H, Berry, CL, Boobis, AR, Cohen, SM, Dekant, W, Galli, CL, Goodman, JI, Gori, GB, Greim, HA, Kaminski, NE, Klaassen, CD, Klaunig, JE, Lotti, M, Marquardt, HWJ, Moretto, A, Pelkonen, O, Sipes, IG, Wallace, KB & Yamazaki, H 2018, 'Obfuscating transparency?', Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology, vol. 97, pp. A1-A3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.004
Aschner M, Autrup H, Berry CL, Boobis AR, Cohen SM, Dekant W et al. Obfuscating transparency? Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2018 Aug;97:A1-A3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.004
Aschner, Michael ; Autrup, Herman ; Berry, Colin L. ; Boobis, Alan R. ; Cohen, Samuel M. ; Dekant, Wolfgang ; Galli, Corrado L. ; Goodman, Jay I. ; Gori, Gio B. ; Greim, Helmut A. ; Kaminski, Norbert E. ; Klaassen, Curtis D. ; Klaunig, James E. ; Lotti, Marcello ; Marquardt, Hans WJ ; Moretto, Angelo ; Pelkonen, Olavi ; Sipes, I. Glenn ; Wallace, Kendall B. ; Yamazaki, Hiroshi. / Obfuscating transparency?. In: Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology. 2018 ; Vol. 97. pp. A1-A3.
@article{4d56a98bf0234379840607b261bb4093,
title = "Obfuscating transparency?",
abstract = "Several recent and prominent articles in Science and Nature deliberately mischaracterized the nature of genuine scientific evidence. Those articles take issue with the United States Environmental Protection Agency's recent proposal to structure its policies and rules only from studies with transparently published raw data. The articles claim it is an effort to obfuscate with transparency, by eliminating a host of studies not offering raw data. A remarkable declaration by a Science editorial is that properly trained experts can verify the scientific evidence of studies without access to raw data, We assert the Agency's proposal must be sustained. Transparency in reporting is a fundamental ethical imperative of objective scientific research justifying massive official regulations and policies. Putative hazards bereft of independent scientific evidence will continue to stoke public anxieties, calling for precautionary regulations and policies. These should rely not on spurious science but on transparent tradeoffs between the smallest exposures compatible with utility and with social perceptions of affordable precaution.",
author = "Michael Aschner and Herman Autrup and Berry, {Colin L.} and Boobis, {Alan R.} and Cohen, {Samuel M.} and Wolfgang Dekant and Galli, {Corrado L.} and Goodman, {Jay I.} and Gori, {Gio B.} and Greim, {Helmut A.} and Kaminski, {Norbert E.} and Klaassen, {Curtis D.} and Klaunig, {James E.} and Marcello Lotti and Marquardt, {Hans WJ} and Angelo Moretto and Olavi Pelkonen and Sipes, {I. Glenn} and Wallace, {Kendall B.} and Hiroshi Yamazaki",
year = "2018",
month = "8",
doi = "10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.004",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "97",
pages = "A1--A3",
journal = "Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology",
issn = "0273-2300",
publisher = "Academic Press Inc.",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Obfuscating transparency?

AU - Aschner, Michael

AU - Autrup, Herman

AU - Berry, Colin L.

AU - Boobis, Alan R.

AU - Cohen, Samuel M.

AU - Dekant, Wolfgang

AU - Galli, Corrado L.

AU - Goodman, Jay I.

AU - Gori, Gio B.

AU - Greim, Helmut A.

AU - Kaminski, Norbert E.

AU - Klaassen, Curtis D.

AU - Klaunig, James E.

AU - Lotti, Marcello

AU - Marquardt, Hans WJ

AU - Moretto, Angelo

AU - Pelkonen, Olavi

AU - Sipes, I. Glenn

AU - Wallace, Kendall B.

AU - Yamazaki, Hiroshi

PY - 2018/8

Y1 - 2018/8

N2 - Several recent and prominent articles in Science and Nature deliberately mischaracterized the nature of genuine scientific evidence. Those articles take issue with the United States Environmental Protection Agency's recent proposal to structure its policies and rules only from studies with transparently published raw data. The articles claim it is an effort to obfuscate with transparency, by eliminating a host of studies not offering raw data. A remarkable declaration by a Science editorial is that properly trained experts can verify the scientific evidence of studies without access to raw data, We assert the Agency's proposal must be sustained. Transparency in reporting is a fundamental ethical imperative of objective scientific research justifying massive official regulations and policies. Putative hazards bereft of independent scientific evidence will continue to stoke public anxieties, calling for precautionary regulations and policies. These should rely not on spurious science but on transparent tradeoffs between the smallest exposures compatible with utility and with social perceptions of affordable precaution.

AB - Several recent and prominent articles in Science and Nature deliberately mischaracterized the nature of genuine scientific evidence. Those articles take issue with the United States Environmental Protection Agency's recent proposal to structure its policies and rules only from studies with transparently published raw data. The articles claim it is an effort to obfuscate with transparency, by eliminating a host of studies not offering raw data. A remarkable declaration by a Science editorial is that properly trained experts can verify the scientific evidence of studies without access to raw data, We assert the Agency's proposal must be sustained. Transparency in reporting is a fundamental ethical imperative of objective scientific research justifying massive official regulations and policies. Putative hazards bereft of independent scientific evidence will continue to stoke public anxieties, calling for precautionary regulations and policies. These should rely not on spurious science but on transparent tradeoffs between the smallest exposures compatible with utility and with social perceptions of affordable precaution.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85049912351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85049912351&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.004

DO - 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.07.004

M3 - Editorial

C2 - 30017904

AN - SCOPUS:85049912351

VL - 97

SP - A1-A3

JO - Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

JF - Regulatory Toxicology and Pharmacology

SN - 0273-2300

ER -