Abstract
The growing ranks of nurse practitioners (NPs) in rural areas of the United States have the potential to help alleviate existing primary care shortages. This study uses a nationwide source of claims- and EHR-data from 2017 to construct measures of NP clinical autonomy and complexity of care. Comparisons between rural and urban primary care practices reveal greater clinical autonomy for rural NPs, who were more likely to have an independent patient panel, to practice with less physician supervision, and to prescribe Schedule II controlled substances. In contrast, rural and urban NPs provided care of similar complexity. These findings provide the first claims- and EHR-based evidence for the commonly held perception that NPs practice more autonomously in rural areas than in urban areas.
Original language | English (US) |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 684-692 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Medical Care Research and Review |
Volume | 78 |
Issue number | 6 |
Early online date | Jul 29 2020 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - Dec 2021 |
Bibliographical note
Funding Information:The author(s) disclosed receipt of the following financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: This study was supported by the FORHP, HRSA, U.S. Department of HHS (Grant No. 5U1CRH03717) and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (Grant No. 41978).
Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2020.
Keywords
- nurse practitioners
- primary care
- rural health care
- scope of practice