Numerical investigation of partial cavitation regimes over a wedge using large eddy simulation

Mrugank Bhatt, Krishnan Mahesh

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

Partial cavitation over incipient, transitory and periodic regimes is investigated using large eddy simulation (LES) in the (experimental) sharp wedge configuration of Ganesh et al. (2016). The numerical approach is based on a compressible homogeneous mixture model with finite rate mass transfer between the phases. Physical mechanisms of cavity transition observed in the experiments; i.e. re-entrant jet and bubbly shock wave, are both captured in the LES over their respective regimes. Vapor volume fraction data obtained from the LES is quantitatively compared to X-ray densitometry. In the transitory and periodic regimes, void fractions resulting from complex interactions of large regions of vapor in the sheet/cloud show very good comparison with the experiments. In addition, very good agreement with the experiments is obtained for the shedding frequency and the bubbly shock wave propagation speed. In the incipient regime, the qualitative characteristics of the flow (e.g. cavitation inside spanwise vortices in the shear layer) are captured in the simulations. Conditions favoring either the formation of the re-entrant jet or the bubbly shock wave are analyzed by contrasting the LES results between the regimes. In the transitory regime, large pressure recovery from within the cavity to outside, and the resulting high adverse pressure gradient at the cavity closure support the formation of re-entrant jet. In the periodic regime, overall low pressures lead to reduced speed of sound and increased medium compressibility, favoring the propagation of shock waves. In a re-entrant jet cycle, vapor production occurs predominantly in the shear layer, and intermittently within the cavity. In a bubbly shock cycle, vapor production is observed spanning the entire thickness of the cavity. Bubbly shock wave propagation is observed to be initiated by the impingement of the collapse-induced pressure waves from the previously shed cloud. Supersonic Mach numbers are observed in the cavity closure regions, while the regions within the grown cavity are subsonic due to the negligible flow velocities.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Article number103155
JournalInternational Journal of Multiphase Flow
Volume122
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 2020

Fingerprint

Large eddy simulation
large eddy simulation
cavitation flow
Cavitation
Shock waves
wedges
cavities
Vapors
vapors
shock wave propagation
Wave propagation
shock waves
shear layers
closures
Void fraction
Experiments
Acoustic wave velocity
pressure recovery
Pressure gradient
Compressibility

Keywords

  • Bubbly shock waves
  • Large eddy simulation (LES)
  • Partial cavitation
  • Re-entrant jet
  • Sheet/cloud cavitation

Cite this

Numerical investigation of partial cavitation regimes over a wedge using large eddy simulation. / Bhatt, Mrugank; Mahesh, Krishnan.

In: International Journal of Multiphase Flow, Vol. 122, 103155, 01.2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

@article{5131069e71da4088be87a7f2265ff752,
title = "Numerical investigation of partial cavitation regimes over a wedge using large eddy simulation",
abstract = "Partial cavitation over incipient, transitory and periodic regimes is investigated using large eddy simulation (LES) in the (experimental) sharp wedge configuration of Ganesh et al. (2016). The numerical approach is based on a compressible homogeneous mixture model with finite rate mass transfer between the phases. Physical mechanisms of cavity transition observed in the experiments; i.e. re-entrant jet and bubbly shock wave, are both captured in the LES over their respective regimes. Vapor volume fraction data obtained from the LES is quantitatively compared to X-ray densitometry. In the transitory and periodic regimes, void fractions resulting from complex interactions of large regions of vapor in the sheet/cloud show very good comparison with the experiments. In addition, very good agreement with the experiments is obtained for the shedding frequency and the bubbly shock wave propagation speed. In the incipient regime, the qualitative characteristics of the flow (e.g. cavitation inside spanwise vortices in the shear layer) are captured in the simulations. Conditions favoring either the formation of the re-entrant jet or the bubbly shock wave are analyzed by contrasting the LES results between the regimes. In the transitory regime, large pressure recovery from within the cavity to outside, and the resulting high adverse pressure gradient at the cavity closure support the formation of re-entrant jet. In the periodic regime, overall low pressures lead to reduced speed of sound and increased medium compressibility, favoring the propagation of shock waves. In a re-entrant jet cycle, vapor production occurs predominantly in the shear layer, and intermittently within the cavity. In a bubbly shock cycle, vapor production is observed spanning the entire thickness of the cavity. Bubbly shock wave propagation is observed to be initiated by the impingement of the collapse-induced pressure waves from the previously shed cloud. Supersonic Mach numbers are observed in the cavity closure regions, while the regions within the grown cavity are subsonic due to the negligible flow velocities.",
keywords = "Bubbly shock waves, Large eddy simulation (LES), Partial cavitation, Re-entrant jet, Sheet/cloud cavitation",
author = "Mrugank Bhatt and Krishnan Mahesh",
year = "2020",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.103155",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "122",
journal = "International Journal of Multiphase Flow",
issn = "0301-9322",
publisher = "Elsevier BV",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Numerical investigation of partial cavitation regimes over a wedge using large eddy simulation

AU - Bhatt, Mrugank

AU - Mahesh, Krishnan

PY - 2020/1

Y1 - 2020/1

N2 - Partial cavitation over incipient, transitory and periodic regimes is investigated using large eddy simulation (LES) in the (experimental) sharp wedge configuration of Ganesh et al. (2016). The numerical approach is based on a compressible homogeneous mixture model with finite rate mass transfer between the phases. Physical mechanisms of cavity transition observed in the experiments; i.e. re-entrant jet and bubbly shock wave, are both captured in the LES over their respective regimes. Vapor volume fraction data obtained from the LES is quantitatively compared to X-ray densitometry. In the transitory and periodic regimes, void fractions resulting from complex interactions of large regions of vapor in the sheet/cloud show very good comparison with the experiments. In addition, very good agreement with the experiments is obtained for the shedding frequency and the bubbly shock wave propagation speed. In the incipient regime, the qualitative characteristics of the flow (e.g. cavitation inside spanwise vortices in the shear layer) are captured in the simulations. Conditions favoring either the formation of the re-entrant jet or the bubbly shock wave are analyzed by contrasting the LES results between the regimes. In the transitory regime, large pressure recovery from within the cavity to outside, and the resulting high adverse pressure gradient at the cavity closure support the formation of re-entrant jet. In the periodic regime, overall low pressures lead to reduced speed of sound and increased medium compressibility, favoring the propagation of shock waves. In a re-entrant jet cycle, vapor production occurs predominantly in the shear layer, and intermittently within the cavity. In a bubbly shock cycle, vapor production is observed spanning the entire thickness of the cavity. Bubbly shock wave propagation is observed to be initiated by the impingement of the collapse-induced pressure waves from the previously shed cloud. Supersonic Mach numbers are observed in the cavity closure regions, while the regions within the grown cavity are subsonic due to the negligible flow velocities.

AB - Partial cavitation over incipient, transitory and periodic regimes is investigated using large eddy simulation (LES) in the (experimental) sharp wedge configuration of Ganesh et al. (2016). The numerical approach is based on a compressible homogeneous mixture model with finite rate mass transfer between the phases. Physical mechanisms of cavity transition observed in the experiments; i.e. re-entrant jet and bubbly shock wave, are both captured in the LES over their respective regimes. Vapor volume fraction data obtained from the LES is quantitatively compared to X-ray densitometry. In the transitory and periodic regimes, void fractions resulting from complex interactions of large regions of vapor in the sheet/cloud show very good comparison with the experiments. In addition, very good agreement with the experiments is obtained for the shedding frequency and the bubbly shock wave propagation speed. In the incipient regime, the qualitative characteristics of the flow (e.g. cavitation inside spanwise vortices in the shear layer) are captured in the simulations. Conditions favoring either the formation of the re-entrant jet or the bubbly shock wave are analyzed by contrasting the LES results between the regimes. In the transitory regime, large pressure recovery from within the cavity to outside, and the resulting high adverse pressure gradient at the cavity closure support the formation of re-entrant jet. In the periodic regime, overall low pressures lead to reduced speed of sound and increased medium compressibility, favoring the propagation of shock waves. In a re-entrant jet cycle, vapor production occurs predominantly in the shear layer, and intermittently within the cavity. In a bubbly shock cycle, vapor production is observed spanning the entire thickness of the cavity. Bubbly shock wave propagation is observed to be initiated by the impingement of the collapse-induced pressure waves from the previously shed cloud. Supersonic Mach numbers are observed in the cavity closure regions, while the regions within the grown cavity are subsonic due to the negligible flow velocities.

KW - Bubbly shock waves

KW - Large eddy simulation (LES)

KW - Partial cavitation

KW - Re-entrant jet

KW - Sheet/cloud cavitation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074980537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=85074980537&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.103155

DO - 10.1016/j.ijmultiphaseflow.2019.103155

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85074980537

VL - 122

JO - International Journal of Multiphase Flow

JF - International Journal of Multiphase Flow

SN - 0301-9322

M1 - 103155

ER -