TY - JOUR
T1 - Novel approach to the evaluation of large area field sampling methods for crop residue coverage measurement
AU - Li, Falai
AU - Chaplin, Jonathan
PY - 1997/12/1
Y1 - 1997/12/1
N2 - Although many field sampling methods have been used to estimate crop residue coverage in large areas, the widely accepted method is still the line transect method, yet its precision has not been studied thoroughly. In this paper, a novel image processing based approach was used to simulate the line transect sampling, modified line transect sampling, horizontal line sampling, and systematic grid sampling methods for large areas. All methods gave true residue cover if many measurements were made, but with varying precision. The precision was found to be the function of true residue cover and the number of points used in the sampling method. As an example of the simulation results, for 30% corn residue each in a 20 m2 area, an average of five measurements of a 50 foot 100 dot transect line was used to estimate the residue cover, and the percentage error was ±12%. Many more points are required to achieve a higher precision. A more efficient and precise sampling protocol was proposed to estimate residue coverage for large areas.
AB - Although many field sampling methods have been used to estimate crop residue coverage in large areas, the widely accepted method is still the line transect method, yet its precision has not been studied thoroughly. In this paper, a novel image processing based approach was used to simulate the line transect sampling, modified line transect sampling, horizontal line sampling, and systematic grid sampling methods for large areas. All methods gave true residue cover if many measurements were made, but with varying precision. The precision was found to be the function of true residue cover and the number of points used in the sampling method. As an example of the simulation results, for 30% corn residue each in a 20 m2 area, an average of five measurements of a 50 foot 100 dot transect line was used to estimate the residue cover, and the percentage error was ±12%. Many more points are required to achieve a higher precision. A more efficient and precise sampling protocol was proposed to estimate residue coverage for large areas.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0031379078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0031379078&partnerID=8YFLogxK
M3 - Conference article
AN - SCOPUS:0031379078
VL - 1
JO - Paper - American Society of Agricultural Engineers
JF - Paper - American Society of Agricultural Engineers
SN - 0145-0166
T2 - Proceedings of the 1997 ASAE Annual International Meeting. Part 1 (of 3)
Y2 - 10 August 1997 through 14 August 1997
ER -