Abstract
Anthony Doob has documented the evolution of knowledge about sentencing and sentencing policy in Canada since the 1970s, and the social, attitudinal, and psychological forces that influenced them. Except for the enactment, in 1996, of a statute specifying general purposes of sentencing and the enactment of mandatory minimum sentencing laws of limited scope, not much has happened in Canada. By contrast, enormous numbers of changes in law, policy, and practice have occurred in the United States, with mostly negative effects in terms of diminution of justice, crowded prisons, unprecedented imprisonment rates, and worsened racial disparities. Americans would have benefitted from something like Canadian inertia. Canadians have little that is positive and much that is negative to learn from the American sentencing reform experience.
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 465-479 |
| Number of pages | 15 |
| Journal | Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice |
| Volume | 55 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Oct 2013 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 10 Reduced Inequalities
Keywords
- Anthony Doob
- Canadian sentencing
- Comparative sentencing
- Jane Sprott
- Sentencing reform
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of '"Nothing" works: Sentencing "reform" in Canada and the United States'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS