TY - JOUR
T1 - Notes from the field
T2 - Lessons learned from using ecosystem service approaches to inform real-world decisions
AU - Ruckelshaus, Mary
AU - McKenzie, Emily
AU - Tallis, Heather
AU - Guerry, Anne
AU - Daily, Gretchen
AU - Kareiva, Peter
AU - Polasky, Stephen
AU - Ricketts, Taylor
AU - Bhagabati, Nirmal
AU - Wood, Spencer A.
AU - Bernhardt, Joanna
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2013 The Authors.
PY - 2015/7/1
Y1 - 2015/7/1
N2 - While there have been rapid advances in assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES), a critical remaining challenge is how to move from scientific knowledge to real-world decision making. We offer 6 lessons from our experiences applying new approaches and tools for quantifying BES in 20 pilot demonstrations: (1) Applying a BES approach is most effective in leading to policy change as part of an iterative science-policy process; (2) simple ecological production function models have been useful in a diverse set of decision contexts, across a broad range of biophysical, social, and governance systems. Key limitations of simple models arise at very small scales, and in predicting specific future BES values; (3) training local experts in the approaches and tools is important for building local capacity, ownership, trust, and long-term success; (4) decision makers and stakeholders prefer to use a variety of BES value metrics, not only monetary values; (5) an important science gap exists in linking changes in BES to changes in livelihoods, health, cultural values, and other metrics of human wellbeing; and (6) communicating uncertainty in useful and transparent ways remains challenging.
AB - While there have been rapid advances in assessments of biodiversity and ecosystem services (BES), a critical remaining challenge is how to move from scientific knowledge to real-world decision making. We offer 6 lessons from our experiences applying new approaches and tools for quantifying BES in 20 pilot demonstrations: (1) Applying a BES approach is most effective in leading to policy change as part of an iterative science-policy process; (2) simple ecological production function models have been useful in a diverse set of decision contexts, across a broad range of biophysical, social, and governance systems. Key limitations of simple models arise at very small scales, and in predicting specific future BES values; (3) training local experts in the approaches and tools is important for building local capacity, ownership, trust, and long-term success; (4) decision makers and stakeholders prefer to use a variety of BES value metrics, not only monetary values; (5) an important science gap exists in linking changes in BES to changes in livelihoods, health, cultural values, and other metrics of human wellbeing; and (6) communicating uncertainty in useful and transparent ways remains challenging.
KW - Decision support
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Human development and conservation
KW - PES
KW - Spatial planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84882362864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84882362864&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009
DO - 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.07.009
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84882362864
SN - 0921-8009
VL - 115
SP - 11
EP - 21
JO - Ecological Economics
JF - Ecological Economics
ER -