TY - JOUR
T1 - Not all locations are created equal
T2 - Exploring how adults hide and search for objects
AU - Legge, Eric L.G.
AU - Spetch, Marcia L.
AU - Cenkner, Andrew
AU - Bulitko, Vadim
AU - Anderson, Craig
AU - Brown, Matthew
AU - Heth, Donald
PY - 2012/5/11
Y1 - 2012/5/11
N2 - Little is known about the strategies people use to effectively hide objects from others, or to search for objects others have hidden. The present research extends a recent investigation of people's hiding and searching strategies in a simple room with 9 cache location. In the present studies, people hid and searched for three objects under more than 70 floor tiles in complex real and virtual rooms. Experiment 1 replicated several finding of Talbot et al within the more complex real and virtual environments. Specifically, people traveled further from origin and selected more dispersed locations when hiding than when searching. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that: 1) people were attracted to an area of darkness when searching and avoided locations close to a window when hiding, 2) when search attempts were limited to three choices, people searched farther from origin and dispersed their locations more when hiding than when searching, and 3) informing people that they would need to recover their hidden objects altered their hiding behavior and increased recovery accuracy. Across all experiments, consistencies in location preferences emerged, with more preference for the middle of the room during hiding and more preference for corners of the room during searching. Even though the same people participated in both the hiding and searching tasks, it appears that people use different strategies to select hiding places than to search for objects hidden by others.
AB - Little is known about the strategies people use to effectively hide objects from others, or to search for objects others have hidden. The present research extends a recent investigation of people's hiding and searching strategies in a simple room with 9 cache location. In the present studies, people hid and searched for three objects under more than 70 floor tiles in complex real and virtual rooms. Experiment 1 replicated several finding of Talbot et al within the more complex real and virtual environments. Specifically, people traveled further from origin and selected more dispersed locations when hiding than when searching. Experiments 2 and 3 showed that: 1) people were attracted to an area of darkness when searching and avoided locations close to a window when hiding, 2) when search attempts were limited to three choices, people searched farther from origin and dispersed their locations more when hiding than when searching, and 3) informing people that they would need to recover their hidden objects altered their hiding behavior and increased recovery accuracy. Across all experiments, consistencies in location preferences emerged, with more preference for the middle of the room during hiding and more preference for corners of the room during searching. Even though the same people participated in both the hiding and searching tasks, it appears that people use different strategies to select hiding places than to search for objects hidden by others.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84860992375&partnerID=8YFLogxK
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84860992375&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1371/journal.pone.0036993
DO - 10.1371/journal.pone.0036993
M3 - Article
C2 - 22606324
AN - SCOPUS:84860992375
SN - 1932-6203
VL - 7
JO - PloS one
JF - PloS one
IS - 5
M1 - e36993
ER -