Nonlinearities in rapid event-related fMRI explained by stimulus scaling

Genevieve M. Heckman, Seth E. Bouvier, Valerie A. Carr, Erin M. Harley, Kristen S. Cardinal, Stephen A. Engel

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

19 Scopus citations

Abstract

Because of well-known nonlinearities in fMRI, responses measured with rapid event-related designs are smaller than responses measured with spaced designs. Surprisingly, no study to date has tested whether rapid designs also change the pattern of responses across different stimulus conditions. Here we report the results of such a test. We measured cortical responses to a flickering checkerboard at different contrasts using rapid and spaced event-related fMRI. The relative magnitude of responses across contrast conditions differed between rapid and spaced designs. Modeling the effect of the rapid design as a scaling of stimulus strength provided a good account of the data. The data were less well fit by a model that scaled the strength of responses. A similar stimulus scaling model has explained effects of neural adaptation, which suggests that adaptation may account for the observed difference between rapid and spaced designs. In a second experiment, we changed the stimulus in ways known to reduce neural adaptation and found much smaller differences between the two designs. Stimulus scaling provides a simple way to account for nonlinearities in event-related fMRI and relate data from rapid designs to data gathered using slower presentation rates.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)651-660
Number of pages10
JournalNeuroImage
Volume34
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 15 2007

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Nonlinearities in rapid event-related fMRI explained by stimulus scaling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Heckman, G. M., Bouvier, S. E., Carr, V. A., Harley, E. M., Cardinal, K. S., & Engel, S. A. (2007). Nonlinearities in rapid event-related fMRI explained by stimulus scaling. NeuroImage, 34(2), 651-660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2006.09.038