Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk

Daniel R. MacNulty, Douglas W. Smith, L. David Mech, John A. Vucetich, Craig Packer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

68 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Despite the popular view that social predators live in groups because group hunting facilitates prey capture, the apparent tendency for hunting success to peak at small group sizes suggests that the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture. Few empirical studies, however, have tested for nonlinear relationships between hunting success and group size, and none have demonstrated why success trails off after peaking. Here, we use a unique dataset of observations of individually known wolves (Canis lupus) hunting elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park to show that the relationship between success and group size is indeed nonlinear and that individuals withholding effort (free riding) is why success does not increase across large group sizes. Beyond 4 wolves, hunting success leveled off, and individual performance (a measure of effort) decreased for reasons unrelated to interference from inept hunters, individual age, or size. But performance did drop faster among wolves with an incentive to hold back, i.e., nonbreeders with no dependent offspring, those performing dangerous predatory tasks, i.e., grabbing and restraining prey, and those in groups of proficient hunters. These results suggest that decreasing performance was free riding and that was why success leveled off in groups with >4 wolves that had superficially appeared to be cooperating. This is the first direct evidence that nonlinear trends in group hunting success reflect a switch from cooperation to free riding. It also highlights how hunting success per se is unlikely to promote formation and maintenance of large groups.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)75-82
Number of pages8
JournalBehavioral Ecology
Volume23
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 2012

Fingerprint

elks
wolves
group size
hunting
prey capture
Canis lupus
Cervus elaphus
national parks
predators
effect
incentive
national park
predator
hunters

Keywords

  • Canis lupus
  • carnivore
  • cooperation
  • free riding
  • group hunting
  • group living
  • interference
  • predation
  • sociality
  • wolf

Cite this

Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk. / MacNulty, Daniel R.; Smith, Douglas W.; Mech, L. David; Vucetich, John A.; Packer, Craig.

In: Behavioral Ecology, Vol. 23, No. 1, 01.01.2012, p. 75-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

MacNulty, Daniel R. ; Smith, Douglas W. ; Mech, L. David ; Vucetich, John A. ; Packer, Craig. / Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk. In: Behavioral Ecology. 2012 ; Vol. 23, No. 1. pp. 75-82.
@article{56979317d49649c8aa602b3328d4000e,
title = "Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk",
abstract = "Despite the popular view that social predators live in groups because group hunting facilitates prey capture, the apparent tendency for hunting success to peak at small group sizes suggests that the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture. Few empirical studies, however, have tested for nonlinear relationships between hunting success and group size, and none have demonstrated why success trails off after peaking. Here, we use a unique dataset of observations of individually known wolves (Canis lupus) hunting elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park to show that the relationship between success and group size is indeed nonlinear and that individuals withholding effort (free riding) is why success does not increase across large group sizes. Beyond 4 wolves, hunting success leveled off, and individual performance (a measure of effort) decreased for reasons unrelated to interference from inept hunters, individual age, or size. But performance did drop faster among wolves with an incentive to hold back, i.e., nonbreeders with no dependent offspring, those performing dangerous predatory tasks, i.e., grabbing and restraining prey, and those in groups of proficient hunters. These results suggest that decreasing performance was free riding and that was why success leveled off in groups with >4 wolves that had superficially appeared to be cooperating. This is the first direct evidence that nonlinear trends in group hunting success reflect a switch from cooperation to free riding. It also highlights how hunting success per se is unlikely to promote formation and maintenance of large groups.",
keywords = "Canis lupus, carnivore, cooperation, free riding, group hunting, group living, interference, predation, sociality, wolf",
author = "MacNulty, {Daniel R.} and Smith, {Douglas W.} and Mech, {L. David} and Vucetich, {John A.} and Craig Packer",
year = "2012",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/beheco/arr159",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "23",
pages = "75--82",
journal = "Behavioral Ecology",
issn = "1045-2249",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonlinear effects of group size on the success of wolves hunting elk

AU - MacNulty, Daniel R.

AU - Smith, Douglas W.

AU - Mech, L. David

AU - Vucetich, John A.

AU - Packer, Craig

PY - 2012/1/1

Y1 - 2012/1/1

N2 - Despite the popular view that social predators live in groups because group hunting facilitates prey capture, the apparent tendency for hunting success to peak at small group sizes suggests that the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture. Few empirical studies, however, have tested for nonlinear relationships between hunting success and group size, and none have demonstrated why success trails off after peaking. Here, we use a unique dataset of observations of individually known wolves (Canis lupus) hunting elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park to show that the relationship between success and group size is indeed nonlinear and that individuals withholding effort (free riding) is why success does not increase across large group sizes. Beyond 4 wolves, hunting success leveled off, and individual performance (a measure of effort) decreased for reasons unrelated to interference from inept hunters, individual age, or size. But performance did drop faster among wolves with an incentive to hold back, i.e., nonbreeders with no dependent offspring, those performing dangerous predatory tasks, i.e., grabbing and restraining prey, and those in groups of proficient hunters. These results suggest that decreasing performance was free riding and that was why success leveled off in groups with >4 wolves that had superficially appeared to be cooperating. This is the first direct evidence that nonlinear trends in group hunting success reflect a switch from cooperation to free riding. It also highlights how hunting success per se is unlikely to promote formation and maintenance of large groups.

AB - Despite the popular view that social predators live in groups because group hunting facilitates prey capture, the apparent tendency for hunting success to peak at small group sizes suggests that the formation of large groups is unrelated to prey capture. Few empirical studies, however, have tested for nonlinear relationships between hunting success and group size, and none have demonstrated why success trails off after peaking. Here, we use a unique dataset of observations of individually known wolves (Canis lupus) hunting elk (Cervus elaphus) in Yellowstone National Park to show that the relationship between success and group size is indeed nonlinear and that individuals withholding effort (free riding) is why success does not increase across large group sizes. Beyond 4 wolves, hunting success leveled off, and individual performance (a measure of effort) decreased for reasons unrelated to interference from inept hunters, individual age, or size. But performance did drop faster among wolves with an incentive to hold back, i.e., nonbreeders with no dependent offspring, those performing dangerous predatory tasks, i.e., grabbing and restraining prey, and those in groups of proficient hunters. These results suggest that decreasing performance was free riding and that was why success leveled off in groups with >4 wolves that had superficially appeared to be cooperating. This is the first direct evidence that nonlinear trends in group hunting success reflect a switch from cooperation to free riding. It also highlights how hunting success per se is unlikely to promote formation and maintenance of large groups.

KW - Canis lupus

KW - carnivore

KW - cooperation

KW - free riding

KW - group hunting

KW - group living

KW - interference

KW - predation

KW - sociality

KW - wolf

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84555170597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=84555170597&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1093/beheco/arr159

DO - 10.1093/beheco/arr159

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84555170597

VL - 23

SP - 75

EP - 82

JO - Behavioral Ecology

JF - Behavioral Ecology

SN - 1045-2249

IS - 1

ER -