Abstract
To the Editor: The roles of state and local health departments' alternative test sites and nonalternative test sites (physicians' offices, clinics, and hospitals) in screening nondonors for antibody to human immunodeficiency virus (HIV, or HTLV-III/LAV) have not been evaluated. Such data are necessary to develop rational public health policies for the appropriate use and availability of HIV antibody testing. Of particular interest is the perception that screening at alternative test sites is anonymous (i.e., patients' names are requested, but services will not be denied if patients refuse to provide their names), whereas test results obtained at nonalternative test sites are….
| Original language | English (US) |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 581-582 |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Journal | New England Journal of Medicine |
| Volume | 315 |
| Issue number | 9 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 28 1986 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Nondonor HIV Antibody Testing in Minnesota'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS