Nonbiased Assessment: A Need for Operationalism

James B. Duffey, John Salvia, James Tucker, James E Ysseldyke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

6 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The current technical history of nonbiased assessment is highlighted. Definitions of fairness and experts' attempts to alleviate problems associated with bias in assessment are reviewed. Factors relating to nonbiased assessment are emphasized that normally do not receive sufficient attention. Decisions currently made as a result of the assessment process are reviewed and an examination made of how decisions based on inappropriate evaluation can negate the validity of the assessment process. Finally, the utility of many recent efforts to resolve the problems of bias in assessment is questioned and it is suggested that very basic systematic changes are needed before real progress can be made in reducing bias in assessment.

Original languageEnglish (US)
Pages (from-to)427-434
Number of pages8
JournalExceptional children
Volume47
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jan 1 1981

Fingerprint

Process Assessment (Health Care)
Needs Assessment
History
trend
fairness
expert
examination
history
evaluation

Cite this

Duffey, J. B., Salvia, J., Tucker, J., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (1981). Nonbiased Assessment: A Need for Operationalism. Exceptional children, 47(6), 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298104700604

Nonbiased Assessment : A Need for Operationalism. / Duffey, James B.; Salvia, John; Tucker, James; Ysseldyke, James E.

In: Exceptional children, Vol. 47, No. 6, 01.01.1981, p. 427-434.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Duffey, JB, Salvia, J, Tucker, J & Ysseldyke, JE 1981, 'Nonbiased Assessment: A Need for Operationalism', Exceptional children, vol. 47, no. 6, pp. 427-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298104700604
Duffey JB, Salvia J, Tucker J, Ysseldyke JE. Nonbiased Assessment: A Need for Operationalism. Exceptional children. 1981 Jan 1;47(6):427-434. https://doi.org/10.1177/001440298104700604
Duffey, James B. ; Salvia, John ; Tucker, James ; Ysseldyke, James E. / Nonbiased Assessment : A Need for Operationalism. In: Exceptional children. 1981 ; Vol. 47, No. 6. pp. 427-434.
@article{0eccd7c347284b4ab4001eb19c4f6787,
title = "Nonbiased Assessment: A Need for Operationalism",
abstract = "The current technical history of nonbiased assessment is highlighted. Definitions of fairness and experts' attempts to alleviate problems associated with bias in assessment are reviewed. Factors relating to nonbiased assessment are emphasized that normally do not receive sufficient attention. Decisions currently made as a result of the assessment process are reviewed and an examination made of how decisions based on inappropriate evaluation can negate the validity of the assessment process. Finally, the utility of many recent efforts to resolve the problems of bias in assessment is questioned and it is suggested that very basic systematic changes are needed before real progress can be made in reducing bias in assessment.",
author = "Duffey, {James B.} and John Salvia and James Tucker and Ysseldyke, {James E}",
year = "1981",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1177/001440298104700604",
language = "English (US)",
volume = "47",
pages = "427--434",
journal = "Exceptional Children",
issn = "0014-4029",
publisher = "Council for Exceptional Children",
number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Nonbiased Assessment

T2 - A Need for Operationalism

AU - Duffey, James B.

AU - Salvia, John

AU - Tucker, James

AU - Ysseldyke, James E

PY - 1981/1/1

Y1 - 1981/1/1

N2 - The current technical history of nonbiased assessment is highlighted. Definitions of fairness and experts' attempts to alleviate problems associated with bias in assessment are reviewed. Factors relating to nonbiased assessment are emphasized that normally do not receive sufficient attention. Decisions currently made as a result of the assessment process are reviewed and an examination made of how decisions based on inappropriate evaluation can negate the validity of the assessment process. Finally, the utility of many recent efforts to resolve the problems of bias in assessment is questioned and it is suggested that very basic systematic changes are needed before real progress can be made in reducing bias in assessment.

AB - The current technical history of nonbiased assessment is highlighted. Definitions of fairness and experts' attempts to alleviate problems associated with bias in assessment are reviewed. Factors relating to nonbiased assessment are emphasized that normally do not receive sufficient attention. Decisions currently made as a result of the assessment process are reviewed and an examination made of how decisions based on inappropriate evaluation can negate the validity of the assessment process. Finally, the utility of many recent efforts to resolve the problems of bias in assessment is questioned and it is suggested that very basic systematic changes are needed before real progress can be made in reducing bias in assessment.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0019511220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/citedby.url?scp=0019511220&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1177/001440298104700604

DO - 10.1177/001440298104700604

M3 - Article

C2 - 6452271

AN - SCOPUS:0019511220

VL - 47

SP - 427

EP - 434

JO - Exceptional Children

JF - Exceptional Children

SN - 0014-4029

IS - 6

ER -